MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4396769938 · doi:10.2118/212145-pa

Integrated Optimization of Hybrid Steam-Solvent Injection in Post-CHOPS Reservoirs with Consideration of Wormhole Networks and Foamy Oil Behavior

2024· article· en· W4396769938 on OpenAlexaff
Senhan Hou, Daihong Gu, Daoyong Yang, Shikai Yang, Min Zhao

Bibliographic record

VenueSPE Journal · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicReservoir Engineering and Simulation Methods
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Regina
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPetroleum engineeringInjection wellWormholeSteam injectionEnvironmental scienceReservoir simulationOil productionPorosityProduction ratePermeability (electromagnetism)Process engineeringGeologyEngineeringGeotechnical engineeringChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Summary For this paper, integrated techniques have been developed to optimize the performance of the hybrid steam-solvent injection processes in a depleted post-cold heavy oil production with sand (CHOPS) reservoir with consideration of wormhole networks and foamy oil behavior. After a reservoir geological model has been built and calibrated with the measured production profiles, its wormhole network is inversely determined using the newly developed pressure-gradient-based (PGB) sand failure criterion. Such a calibrated reservoir geological model is then used to maximize the net present value (NPV) of a hybrid steam-solvent injection process by selecting injection time, soaking time, production time, injection rate, steam temperature, and steam quality as the controlling variables. The genetic algorithm (GA) has been integrated with orthogonal array (OA) and Tabu search to maximize the NPV by delaying the displacement front as well as extending the reservoir life under various strategies. Considering the wormhole network and foamy oil behavior and using the NPV as the objective function, such a modified algorithm can be used to allocate and optimize the production-injection strategies of each huff ‘n’ puff (HnP) cycle in a post-CHOPS reservoir with altered porosity and increased permeability within a unified, consistent, and efficient framework.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.307
Threshold uncertainty score0.339

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.247
Teacher spread0.236 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSPE JournalSame topicReservoir Engineering and Simulation MethodsFrench-language works237,207