MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4396771948 · doi:10.1063/5.0197018

Extended short-wave infrared high-speed all-GeSn PIN photodetectors on silicon

2024· article· en· W4396771948 on OpenAlexafffund
Mahmoud R. M. Atalla, Cédric Lemieux‐Leduc, Simone Assali, Sebastian Koelling, P. Daoust, Oussama Moutanabbir

Bibliographic record

VenueAPL Photonics · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPhotonic and Optical Devices
Canadian institutionsPolytechnique Montréal
FundersLife Sciences Division, Army Research OfficeArmy Research OfficeHORIZON EUROPE Framework ProgrammeAir Force Office of Scientific ResearchMitacsCanada Research ChairsNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaEuropean CommissionCanada Foundation for Innovation
KeywordsPhotodetectorSiliconInfraredMaterials scienceOptoelectronicsOpticsPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

There is an increasing need for silicon-compatible high-bandwidth extended-short wave infrared (e-SWIR) photodetectors (PDs) to implement cost-effective and scalable optoelectronic devices. These systems are quintessential to address several technological bottlenecks in detection and ranging, surveillance, ultrafast spectroscopy, and imaging. In fact, current e-SWIR high-bandwidth PDs are predominantly made of III–V compound semiconductors and thus are costly and suffer a limited integration on silicon besides a low responsivity at wavelengths exceeding 2.3 μm. To circumvent these challenges, Ge1−xSnx semiconductors have been proposed as building blocks for silicon-integrated high-speed e-SWIR devices. Herein, this study demonstrates vertical all-GeSn PIN PDs consisting of p-Ge0.92Sn0.08/i-Ge0.91Sn0.09/n-Ge0.89Sn0.11 and p-Ge0.91Sn0.09/i-Ge0.88Sn0.12/n-Ge0.87Sn0.13 heterostructures grown on silicon following a step-graded temperature-controlled epitaxy protocol. The performance of these PDs was investigated as a function of the device diameter in the 10–30 μm range. The developed PD devices yield a high bandwidth of 12.4 GHz at a bias of 5 V for a device diameter of 10 μm. Moreover, these devices show a high responsivity of 0.24 A/W, a low noise, and a 2.8 μm cutoff wavelength, thus covering the whole e-SWIR range.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.239
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations25
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAPL PhotonicsSame topicPhotonic and Optical DevicesFrench-language works237,207