Disrupted single-subject gray matter networks are associated with cognitive decline and cortical atrophy in Alzheimer’s disease
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background: Research has shown disrupted structural network measures related to cognitive decline and future cortical atrophy during the progression of Alzheimer's disease (AD). However, evidence regarding the individual variability of gray matter network measures and the associations with concurrent cognitive decline and cortical atrophy related to AD is still sparse. Objective: To investigate whether alterations in single-subject gray matter networks are related to concurrent cognitive decline and cortical gray matter atrophy during AD progression. Methods: We analyzed structural MRI data from 185 cognitively normal (CN), 150 mild cognitive impairment (MCI), and 153 AD participants, and calculated the global network metrics of gray matter networks for each participant. We examined the alterations of single-subject gray matter networks in patients with MCI and AD, and investigated the associations of network metrics with concurrent cognitive decline and cortical gray matter atrophy. Results: The small-world properties including gamma, lambda, and sigma had lower values in the MCI and AD groups than the CN group. AD patients had reduced degree, clustering coefficient, and path length than the CN and MCI groups. We observed significant associations of cognitive ability with degree in the CN group, with gamma and sigma in the MCI group, and with degree, connectivity density, clustering coefficient, and path length in the AD group. There were significant correlation patterns between sigma values and cortical gray matter volume in the CN, MCI, and AD groups. Conclusion: These findings suggest the individual variability of gray matter network metrics may be valuable to track concurrent cognitive decline and cortical atrophy during AD progression. This may contribute to a better understanding of cognitive decline and brain morphological alterations related to AD.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".