The study of the relationship between moderate to severe sleep obstructive apnea and cognitive impairment, anxiety, and depression
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Objective The present study endeavored to investigate the interconnection between obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) and cognitive function, alongside the manifestations of depression and anxiety. Simultaneously, an analysis was conducted to discern the factors exerting influence upon cognitive function. Methods A cohort of 102 patients, who had undergone polysomnography (PSG) at Binhu Hospital, Anhui Medical University, between January 2022 and June 2023, was encompassed in the study. Employing the PSG findings, these individuals were classified into two distinct categories: the grouping consisted of those with either negligible or mild OSA, and the other comprised individuals with moderate to severe OSA. Utilizing the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA-Beijing), Stroop Color and Word Test (SCWT), Digit Span Test (DST), Self-rating Depression Scale (SDS), and Self-rating Anxiety Scale (SAS), scores were recorded and analysed for each of the respective assessments. Additionally, discrepancies and associations between these groups were also scrutinized. Results The group exhibiting moderate to severe OSA demonstrated significantly elevated measurements in parameters such as neck circumference, BMI, completion times for SCWT-A, B, C, Sleep Inefficiency Index (SIE), SAS, and SDS, in comparison to the No or Mild OSA group. Furthermore, the moderate–severe OSA group manifested notably diminished MoCA scores in areas of visual–spatial and executive function, memory, language, abstraction, delayed recall, orientation, total MoCA score, lowest oxygen saturation (LSaO2), average oxygen saturation, Digit Span Test-backward(DST-b), and Digit Span Test-forward(DST-f), as contrasted with the no-mild OSA group. These inter-group disparities exhibited statistical significance ( p < 0.05). The MoCA total score portrayed inverse correlations with age, Apnea-Hypopnea Index (AHI), BMI, SIE, SAS, SDS, CT90%, AHT90%, and Hypoxic Apnea Duration (HAD) (ranging from −0.380 to −0.481, p < 0.05). Conversely, it displayed positive correlations with DST-f, DST-b, LSaO2, and average oxygen saturation (ranging from 0.414 to 0.744, p < 0.05). Neck circumference, AHI, and SAS were autonomously linked to MoCA scores (OR = 1.401, 1.028, 1.070, p < 0.05), while AHI exhibited an independent correlation with SDS and SAS scores (OR = 1.001, p = 0.003). Conclusion Patients grappling with moderate to severe OSA frequently reveal cognitive impairment and concomitant emotional predicaments encompassing depression and anxiety. These manifestations share an intimate association with AHI, LSaO2, and average oxygen saturation. Notably, anxiety, when coupled with OSA, emerges as an autonomous influential element impinging upon cognitive impairment.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".