Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract: The complex ironies of Carmina Anacreontea ( CA ) 11 stem from the fact that Anacreon's imitator (mis)uses tropes of erotic attraction magic, seeking to stimulate "bitter" desire in himself with a fiery spell performed at once by and against himself, leaving him with no escape from the eros he counterintuitively demands. To effect his ironically tortuous aim, the speaker of CA 11 plays on the archaic Anacreon's intimate yet contentious relationship with Eros, as represented in his surviving poetry and in anecdotes that speak to his reputation in later antiquity. Réesumé: Les ironies complexes du poème 11 des Carmina Anacreontea ( CA ) sont basées sur le fait que l'imitateur d'Anacréon utilise (mal) les lieux communs de la magie érotique; il cherche à susciter un désir amer en lui-même par un sort virulent jeté par lui-même sur lui-même, ce qui le laisse sans échappatoire face à l' eros qu'il appelle à l'encontre de ses intérêts. Afin de parvenir à son but ironiquement alambiqué, le locuteur de CA 11 joue sur la relation intime et pourtant conflictuelle de l'Anacréon archaïque avec Eros, telle que représentée dans les poèmes préservés d'Anacréon et dans les anecdotes entourant sa réputation dans l'Antiquité tardive.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".