Prognostic Value and Determinants of High‐Sensitivity Cardiac Troponin T in Patients With a Systemic Right Ventricle: Insights From the SERVE Trial
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background The determinants and prognostic value of high‐sensitivity cardiac troponin T (hs‐cTnT) among patients with a systemic right ventricle are largely unknown. Methods and Results Ninety‐eight patients from the randomized controlled SERVE (Effect of Phosphodiesterase‐5 Inhibition With Tadalafil on Systemic Right Ventricular Size and Function) trial were included. The correlation between baseline hs‐cTnT concentrations and biventricular volumes and function quantified by cardiac magnetic resonance or cardiac multirow detector computed tomography was assessed by adjusted linear regression models. The prognostic value of hs‐cTnT was assessed by adjusted Cox proportional hazards models, survival analysis, and concordance statistics. The primary outcome was time to the composite of clinically relevant arrhythmia, hospitalization for heart failure, or all‐cause death. Median age was 39 (interquartile range, 32–48) years, and 32% were women. Median hs‐cTnT concentration was 7 (interquartile range, 4–11) ng/L. Coefficients of determination for the relationship between hs‐cTnT concentrations and right ventricular end‐systolic volume index and right ventricular ejection fraction (RVEF) were +0.368 ( P =0.046) and −0.381 ( P =0.018), respectively. The sex‐ and age‐adjusted hazard ratio for the primary outcome of hs‐cTnT at 2 and 4 times the reference level (5 ng/L) were 2.89 (95% CI, 1.14–7.29) and 4.42 (95% CI, 1.21–16.15), respectively. The prognostic performance quantified by the concordance statistics for age‐ and sex‐adjusted models based on hs‐cTnT, right ventricular ejection fraction, and peak oxygen uptake predicted were comparable: 0.71% (95% CI, 0.61–0.82), 0.72% (95% CI, 0.59–0.84), and 0.71% (95% CI, 0.59–0.83), respectively. Conclusions Hs‐cTnT concentration was significantly correlated with right ventricular ejection fraction and right ventricular end‐systolic volume index in patients with a systemic right ventricle. The prognostic accuracy of hs‐cTnT was comparable to that of right ventricular ejection fraction and peak oxygen uptake predicted. Registration URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov ; Unique identifier: NCT03049540.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.006 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".