MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Prison care in the Kherson province in the second quarter of the XIX century

2024· article· en· W4396803809 on OpenAlex
Oleksiy Korotkyi

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueScientific Papers of the Kamianets-Podilskyi National Ivan Ohiienko University History · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics
TopicMedical and Pharmaceutic Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPrisonQuarter (Canadian coin)Context (archaeology)UkrainianPolitical scienceEmpireCriminologyPrison reformLawSociologyPublic administrationHistoryArchaeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The purpose is to study the specifics of prison care in the Kherson province in the second quarter of the nineteenth century. The research methodology is based on the principles of a specific historical approach or historicism. The study uses historical and genetic, historical and comparative, periodisation, and descriptive methods. The scientific novelty of the study is that it is the first attempt to form a holistic view of the origins of prison care in the Kherson province, in particular in such cities as Kherson and Alexandria. The study analyses for the first time the formation and activities of the Kherson Prison Care Committee, and examines its work in modernising the prison system. At the same time, the first attempts to establish trusteeship committees in the county towns of the province are studied. In turn, the activities of the Kherson Committee of Trustees were examined in the context of the formation of prison care in the Ukrainian provinces of the Russian Empire. Conclusions. It has been established that the Kherson Prison Trusteeship Committee emerged after the construction of the Kherson prison castle, which was a typical phenomenon in the Ukrainian provinces of the empire. The development of its activities, like most regional committees, can be divided into two stages. From its foundation in 1835 to the 1840s, the committee introduced significant changes to the prison regime and prisoners' living conditions, trying to organise the functioning of the provincial prison on the basis of the Prison Instruction of 1831. During the 1840s, until the reform of prison care in 1851 and the provincial audit, the committee's activity declined and it performed exclusively economic functions. The reason for the passivity of local elites in promoting prison reform is associated with the lack of educational and ecumenical ideals inherent in the organisers of prison reforms in Western Europe and the capital of the Russian Empire..

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.337
Threshold uncertainty score0.945

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.057
GPT teacher head0.327
Teacher spread0.270 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it