Assessment of the impact of column-to-beam strength ratio on seismic response of RC beam-column connections
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Beam-column joints play an important role in the overall resistance of reinforced concrete frames during seismic events. The Earthquakes of Al Asnam on October 10, 1980, and Boumerdes on May 21, 2003 in Algeria, have highlighted the failure of beam-column joints as a cause of building collapse. 3D nonlinear finite element analysis with ANSYS software has been used in order to examine exterior RC beam-column joints under monotonic loading. The research has investigated the influence of the value of the column-to-beam strength ratio (CBSR) of these joints on shear strength and seismic performance of concrete structures by changing the height and longitudinal reinforcement of the beam while keeping column dimensions constant. It has been shown that the beam-column depth ratio and the beam longitudinal reinforcement ratio have a significant effect on the shear capacity and seismic behaviour of exterior beam-column joints. An appropriate value of the flexural strength ratio between the column and beam is crucial in order to establish a "strong column-weak beam" mechanism in reinforced concrete frames, because inadequate values can lead to premature failure or reduced shear capacity at the junction. The Algerian seismic code – RPA99/version2003 suggests a minimum value of column-to-beam strength ratio equal to 1.25 at joints for seismic design when building codes in other countries call for higher ratios. Nevertheless, this approach might not accurately represent the actual behaviour and could constrain the optimal performance of structures.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".