MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4396817466 · doi:10.1109/tvlsi.2024.3394871

A High Speed and Area Efficient Processor for Elliptic Curve Scalar Point Multiplication for GF(2<i> <sup>m</sup> </i>)

2024· article· en· W4396817466 on OpenAlexaff
Madhan Thirumoorthi, Alexander J. Leigh, Moslem Heidarpur, Mitra Mirhassani, Mohammed Khalid

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Very Large Scale Integration (VLSI) Systems · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicCryptography and Residue Arithmetic
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Windsor
Fundersnot available
KeywordsScalar multiplicationElliptic curve point multiplicationElliptic curveScalar (mathematics)Elliptic curve cryptographyArithmeticElliptic Curve Digital Signature AlgorithmMultiplication (music)Point (geometry)MathematicsParallel computingComputer sciencePhysicsCombinatoricsPure mathematicsGeometryOperating systemPublic-key cryptography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Binary polynomial multipliers impact the overall performance and cost of elliptic curve cryptography (ECC) systems. Multiplication algorithms with subquadratic computational complexity are widely used to reduce area requirements and improve the delay of ECC cryptographic hardware. This work presents an elliptic curve scalar point multiplication (SPM) processor implementation using a novel classification of improved overlap-free multipliers targeting applications in the Internet of Things (IoT) devices. The proposed multipliers combine the advantages of fewer partial products and the overlap-free reconstructions which results in better recurrence and improved performance. The proposed multipliers and point multiplication hardware were designed, implemented, and tested on FPGA. The implemented processor presents a reasonable trade-off between speed and area consumption, and the design compares favorably with the previous designs in terms of area-delay product.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.948
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.239
Teacher spread0.227 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Very Large Scale Integration (VLSI) SystemsSame topicCryptography and Residue ArithmeticFrench-language works237,207