Small GTPases control macropinocytosis of amyloid precursor protein and cleavage to amyloid-β
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The overproduction of the toxic peptide amyloid-beta (Aβ) generated from the cleavage of amyloid precursor protein (APP) is proposed to be a critical event in the development of Alzheimer's disease. Evidence suggests that the cleavage of APP occurs after its internalization from the cell surface. Previously, we identified a novel pathway for APP internalization, which trafficks cell surface APP directly to lysosomes by macropinocytosis, leading to its processing into Aβ. We also demonstrated that ADP-ribosylation factor 6 (Arf6) is required for the macropinocytosis of APP. Here, we characterized the roles of Arf6's downstream effectors Rac1, Cdc42 and RhoA. Both pharmacological inhibition and siRNA knockdown of these proteins reduced the amount of APP colocalized with LAMP1-labeled lysosomes without affecting APP transport to early endosomes. Decreases in the production of both Aβ40 and Aβ42 were also observed by ELISA in response to inhibitor treatment. These findings together demonstrate that Rac1, Cdc42 and RhoA are components of the mechanism regulating the macropinocytosis of APP and targeting these components can reduce the production of Aβ.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".