Synthesis, characterization, and in vitro anticancer evaluation of 2,4 disulfonylsubstituted 5-aminothiazoles
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Novel 2,4-disulfonylsubstituted 5-aminothiazoles were synthesized and their anticancer activity was assessed at a high dose (10 μM) against NCI 60 cancer cell lines. Compounds 24 and 25 showed the antiproliferative activity with mean growth inhibition about 66.0%. Replacing 4-hydroxypiperidine 24 with the more hydrophilic N-methyl piperazine 25 increased the number of sensitive cell lines while replacing these hydrophilic groups with lipophilic ones abolished the anticancer activity. The COMPARE analysis showed that the tested compounds had a moderate positive correlation with alkylating agents (CCNU and methyl CCNU) and with a purine nucleotide biosynthesis inhibitor analog (L-cysteine). The results indicate that the above mechanisms of antitumor action of standard compounds are not the main ones for the tested compounds due to the lack of a high correlation. The results of this study allow us to consider compounds 24 and 25 as a basis for their further functionalization to obtain more active compounds.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".