MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Real-time PCR primers and probes for the detection of Shiga toxin genes, including novel subtypes

2024· article· en· W4396834554 on OpenAlexaff
Tanis McMahon, Sarah Clarke, Mylène Deschênes, Kyle Tapp, Burton W. Blais, Alexander Gill

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Food Microbiology · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicEscherichia coli research studies
Canadian institutionsCanadian Food Inspection AgencyHealth Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsShiga toxinSTX2BiologyEscherichia coliShigella dysenteriaePolymerase chain reactionMultiplex polymerase chain reactionMicrobiologyShiga-like toxinMultiplexPlasmidVirologyGeneGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli (STEC) are foodborne enteric pathogens. STEC are differentiated from other E. coli by detection of Shiga toxin (Stx) or its gene (stx). The established nomenclature of Stx identifies ten subtypes (Stx1a, Stx1c, Stxd, Stx2a to Stx2g). An additional nine subtypes have been reported and described (Stx1e, Stx2h to Stx2o). Many PCR protocols only detect a subset of Stx subtypes which limits their inclusivity. Here we describe a real-time PCR assay inclusive of the DNA sequences of representatives of all currently described Stx subtypes. A multiplex real-time PCR assay for detection of stx was developed using nine primers and four probes. Since the identification of STEC does not require differentiation of stx subtypes, the probes use the same fluorescent reporter to enable detection of multiple possible targets in a single reaction. The PCR mixture includes an internal positive control to detect inhibition of the reaction. Thus, the protocol can be performed on a two-channel real-time PCR platform. To reduce the biosafety risk inherent in the use of STEC cultures as process controls, the protocol also includes the option of a non-pathogenic E. coli transformant carrying a plasmid encoding the targeted fragment of the stx2a sequence. The inclusivity of the PCR was assessed against colonies of 137 STEC strains and one strain of Shigella dysenteriae, including strains carrying single copies of stx representing fourteen subtypes (stx1 a, c, d; stx2 a-j and o). Five additional subtypes (stx1e, 2k, 2l, 2m and 2n) were represented by E. coli transformed with plasmids encoding toxoid (enzymatically inactive A subunit) sequences. The exclusivity panel consisted of 70 bacteria, including 21 stx-negative E. coli. Suitability for food analysis was assessed with artificially inoculated ground beef, spinach, cheese, and apple cider. The real-time PCR generated positive results for all 19 stx subtypes, represented by colonies of STEC, S. dysenteriae and E. coli transformants carrying stx toxoid plasmids. Tests of exclusivity panel colonies were all negative. The real-time PCR detected the presence of stx in all inoculated food enrichments tested, and the presence of STEC was confirmed by isolation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.036

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0040.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.002
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0020.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0110.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.300
Teacher spread0.279 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Food MicrobiologySame topicEscherichia coli research studiesFrench-language works237,207