MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

INGR Roadmap Edge Services and Automation Chapter

2023· article· en· W4396853296 on OpenAlexaff
Mohamad Patwary, Prakash Ramchandran, Sujata Tibrewala, T. K. Lala, Frederick Kautz, Estefanía Coronado, Roberto Riggio, Someswar Ganugapati, Sunku Ranganathan, Liangkai Liu, Giovanni Giambene, Zhili Sun, Mathew Borst, Brad Kolaz, Ashutosh Dutta, Chi-Ming Chen, Malini Bhandaru

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicIoT and Edge/Fog Computing
Canadian institutionsFuture Earth
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceEdge computingEnhanced Data Rates for GSM EvolutionEdge deviceComputer networkTelecommunicationsCloud computingOperating system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This third edition (2023) continues to reflect the Edge service roadmap and journey with evolving key drivers and developments. It replaces the two earlier versions. 5G deployments have reached critical markets and are fast evolving towards 6G promising higher performance and near sub-millisecond latency. Higher automation in use cases fueled by AI (e.g. like ChatGPT) is expected to be the core of future applications and services. The service providers have started re-focusing on use cases that can leverage the new and improved capabilities for better average revenue per unit (ARPU) for both consumers and enterprises. Some of the edge relevant Service oriented use cases are based on key constraints (low latency, high throughput, low jitter) ▪Industrial Internet of Things (IIoT) Industry 4.0 ▪Vehicle to anything - V2X (autonomous vehicle / intelligent transportation / traveling edge) ▪Telehealth / telemedicine / remote diagnostics ▪Content delivery (with caching, real time, rich media internet applications) ▪Ad hoc, temporary or on as needed mission specific edge services (emergency, ad hoc major events, DoD combat mission, and more) ▪Enabling sustainable development edge applications. Key elements of the edge-inspired infrastructure to support such services may be noted as follows: ▪Enabling edge with AIML, e.g., OpenAI / *ChatGPT ▪Radio-based Multi-Access Edge (MEC) to provide different services ▪Real-time / near real time enabled radio control, management, and xApps based on O-RAN ▪Constraint-based edge infrastructure to optimize power, form factor, and updates to NFV-SDN with the IoT middleware standards OneM2M from ETSI to cover IoT applications ▪The focus on data privacy, security, data “localization and analytics” ▪Intelligent edge microservices and applications deployed using newer infrastructure components from Semiconductor innovations e.g. DPU, IPU, etc. ▪MEC and 5G integration to support location-based edge platform API adaption ▪Small cells and private B5G networks We classify platform aspects with Edge Platform Framework (EPF) and Services with Edge Service Framework (ESF) updates and overall aspects as Edge Service and Platform Framework (ES&PF) for an integrated view.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.930
Threshold uncertainty score0.386

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.234
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicIoT and Edge/Fog ComputingFrench-language works237,207