MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Fixed-nitrogen loss in a deoxygenating coastal ocean: Insights from the Estuary and Gulf of St. Lawrence

2024· preprint· en· W4396858246 on OpenAlexaff
Ludovic Pascal, Félix Cloutier‐Artiwat, Arturo Zanon, Douglas W.R. Wallace, Gwénaëlle Chaillou

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicMarine and coastal ecosystems
Canadian institutionsDalhousie UniversityUniversité du Québec à Rimouski
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEstuaryOceanographyEnvironmental scienceFisheryGeographyGeologyBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Bioavailable nitrogen governs ocean productivity and carbon fixation by regulating phytoplankton growth and community composition. Nitrogen input primarily results from fixation, while denitrification and ANAMMOX removes bioavailable nitrogen in oxygen-depleted conditions. Traditionally considered limited to highly suboxic (i.e., < 5 µM) waters, recent studies suggest fixed-nitrogen removal processes may extend beyond, elevating global nitrogen loss estimates. This study directly quantifies fixed-nitrogen loss across oxygen gradients (from 140 to 35 µM) along the Estuary and Gulf of St. Lawrence using N cycle tracers (, and ). Notably, we observe significant production when concentrations fall below 57-52 µM, including unexpected water column fixed-nitrogen removal processes above suboxia. Benthic production remains unaffected under intensifying deoxygenation from 50 down to 34 µM, but sedimentary nitrification contribution to denitrification diminishes with intensifying deoxygenation. Combined, water column and benthic fixed-nitrogen removal processes drive anomalies and strong deficiency in bottom waters. Additionally, observed concentration threshold triggers production, unveiling the profound impact of ocean deoxygenation on nitrogen cycling, challenging conventional expectations even at hypoxic concentrations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.837
Threshold uncertainty score0.323

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.203
Teacher spread0.191 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMarine and coastal ecosystems→French-language works237,207→