Predation on an adult Gray Treefrog, <i>Hyla versicolor</i> (Hylidae) (LeConte 1825), by a predaceous diving beetle (<i>Cybister</i> sp. or <i>Dytiscus </i>sp.)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
These predators employ a variety of weaponry, including chemicals and venom and physical structures like stingers, sucking apparatuses, pinchers, and large mandibles, to subdue and consume anuran prey.The Gray Treefrog (Dryophytes versicolor) (Fig. 1) is a robust medium-sized North American hylid with noxious unpalatable skin secretions (Dodd 2023;Cannizzaro and Höbel 2023).Dryophytes versicolor has highly variable dorsal coloration, the ability to change color, and a yellow-spotted thigh pattern (Kapfer and Brown 2022).The geographic distribution of D. versicolor is vaguely Y-shaped, extending from eastern Texas to southern Manitoba in the northwest and to Maine in the northeast (Kapfer and Brown 2022).An arboreal generalist, D. versicolor inhabits a variety of forested habitats including deciduous forests, urban parks, pine stands, and tree farms (Wright and Wright 1949), where it can occupy very high microhabitats (to 18 m) (Laughlin et al. 2017).An obligate woodland pond-breeder, hundreds of D. versicolor occupy pools during the summer breeding season (Dodd 2023).A variety of predators known to prey on larval D. versicolor, which are fully palatable and not chemically defended (Dodd 2023), include larval Spotted Salamanders (Ambystoma maculatum), Comet Darner (dragonfly) larvae (Anax longipes), and spiders (Pisauridae) (Groves and Groves 1978;Relyea 2003;Dodd 2023).Dodd ( 2023) and others have postulated that a variety of predators that will consume post-metamorphic D. versicolor include snakes (Nerodia spp.,
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.007 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".