Singly-Fed Large Frequency Ratio Composite Dielectric Resonator Antenna for sub-6 GHz and mm-Wave 5G Applications
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A dielectric resonator antenna (DRA) is proposed for dual-band resonance for the mid-band (sub-6 GHz) and the high-band (mm-wave) 5G applications. The proposed composite DRA consists of an annular dielectric radiator concentrically integrated with a high-permittivity cylindrical DRA to realize resonance at two distinct frequencies with large frequency ratio. The impact of composition of two distinct dielectric materials on the radiation in both bands is analyzed taking into account the effective permittivity of the composite structure. The composite DRA is excited with single Co-planar Waveguide (CPW). The proposed DRA offers resonance at 4.44 GHz in the mid-band and 27.92 GHz in the high-band. The radiation characteristics demonstrate broadside radiation pattern having 6.8 dBi and 4.3 dBi of gain in both bands respectively. The efficiency of the DRA is observed to be 87.1% and 84.71% in the sub-6 GHz and mm-wave bands, respectively. The radiation characteristics make the proposed composite DRA a potential design for numerous 5G applications.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".