MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4396879447 · doi:10.21037/vats-23-77

Pericardial cyst as a cause of recurrent hiccups: a case report

2024· article· en· W4396879447 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueVideo-Assisted Thoracic Surgery · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPathogenesis and Treatment of Hiccups
Canadian institutionsUniversity of AlbertaUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHiccupsMedicineCystCardiologyRadiologySurgery

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Pericardial cysts are an uncommon cause of mediastinal masses. When identified, they are often an incidental finding on imaging. However, when symptomatic, they may present with cough, dyspnea, recurrent pulmonary infections, chest pain, congestive heart failure, or dysphagia. In symptomatic cases, surgical treatment is typically warranted. We present a case where the sole symptom of presentation was recurrent hiccups, refractory to other treatments, that resolved after thoracoscopic resection. Case Description: A 51-year-old male presented to outpatient thoracic surgery clinic with a history of persistent, recurrent hiccups for 3 months. The patient’s past medical history was non-contributory. His hiccups persisted despite attempted medical therapy. On initial chest X-ray, an irregularity of the right heart border was seen. On chest computed tomography (CT), a simple fluid filled pericardial cyst was observed, in close proximity to the right phrenic nerve. The patient underwent a right video-assisted thoracoscopic removal of this pericardial cyst. Post-operatively, the patient recovered well, with complete resolution of hiccups prior to discharge on post-operative day one. No recurrence was seen during follow-up at 4 and 8 weeks. Conclusions: There are few existing cases of pericardial cysts presenting with hiccups, none of which have been approached with video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS), to our knowledge. In this case, we observed persistent hiccups as the sole symptom of presentation of a pericardial cyst. Upon surgical removal via a VATS approach, there was complete symptom dissipation. Pericardial cysts should be considered in the differential diagnosis of recurrent hiccups. If identified, surgical resection can result in complete cessation of symptoms.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.186
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.072
GPT teacher head0.371
Teacher spread0.300 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it