MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4396893263 · doi:10.1080/07038992.2024.2351004

Use of GEDI Signal and Environmental Parameters to Improve Canopy Height Estimation over Tropical Forest Ecosystems in Mayotte Island

2024· article· en· W4396893263 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Kamel Lahssini, Nicolas Baghdadi, Guerric Le Maire, Stéphane Dupuy, Ibrahim Fayad

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Remote Sensing · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicRemote Sensing and LiDAR Applications
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersInstitut National de Recherche pour l'Agriculture, l'Alimentation et l'EnvironnementCentre National d’Etudes SpatialesNational Aeronautics and Space Administration
KeywordsCanopyTerrainLidarEnvironmental scienceScale (ratio)Remote sensingGeographyMathematicsCartography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Canopy height is a fundamental parameter for describing forest ecosystems.GEDI is a spaceborne LiDAR system that was designed to measure vegetation's vertical structure at a global scale.This study evaluates the accuracy of GEDI-derived canopy height estimates over complex tropical forests in Mayotte Island (Overseas France) characterized by moderate height and biomass levels as well as a relatively steep terrain.The influence of GEDI signal and environmental parameters (canopy height, beam sensitivity and slope) on height estimates was assessed.Linear as well as non-linear approaches were implemented using the GEDI L2A product to estimate canopy height.Empirical models were trained on reference data derived from airborne LiDAR scanning.The results showed that using regression models built on multiple GEDI metrics yielded improved accuracies compared to a direct estimation from a single GEDI height metric.Canopy height, beam sensitivity and terrain slope were found to have a significant impact on the height metrics derived from GEDI waveforms.Conversely, both linear and non-linear regression models produced unbiased and stable estimates. RSUMLa hauteur de la canope est un paramtre fondamental pour dcrire les cosystmes forestiers.GEDI est un systme LiDAR spatial conu pour mesurer la structure verticale de la vgtation l'chelle mondiale.Cette tude value la prcision des estimations de la hauteur de la canope partir de GEDI sur des forts tropicales complexes de l'le de Mayotte (France d'outre-mer) caractrises par des hauteurs et des niveaux de biomasse modrs ainsi que par un terrain relativement escarp.L'influence du signal GEDI et des paramtres environnementaux (hauteur de la canope, sensibilit du faisceau laser et pente du terrain) sur les estimations de hauteur a t value.Des approches linaires et non-linaires ont t mises en oeuvre en utilisant le produit GEDI L2A pour estimer la hauteur de la canope.Des modles empiriques ont t entrans sur des donnes de rfrence issues d'acquisitions par LiDAR aroport.Les rsultats ont montr que l'utilization de modles de rgression construits partir de plusieurs mtriques GEDI permettait d'amliorer la prcision par rapport une estimation directe partir d'une seule mtrique de hauteur GEDI.La hauteur de la canope, la sensibilit du faisceau et la pente ont eu un impact significatif sur les mtriques de hauteur drives des formes d'onde GEDI.Par ailleurs, les modles de rgression linaire et non-linaire ont produit des estimations stables et sans biais.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.875
Threshold uncertainty score0.973

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.207
Teacher spread0.197 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Remote SensingSame topicRemote Sensing and LiDAR ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207