Effects of spruce budworm defoliation on in-stream algal production and carbon use by food webs
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Insect defoliation is a widespread cause of forest disturbance in Canada, and it has the potential to alter terrestrial carbon contributions to stream consumers and thus affect stream ecosystems. Although defoliation by spruce budworms ( Choristoneura fumiferana) is considered a natural disturbance with importance to forest succession, the magnitude and duration of outbreaks are increasing, and there is a growing need to understand their downstream consequences. To examine this, algal productivity and autochthonous (in-stream) energy supporting macroinvertebrate and fish consumers (using δ13C, δ15N) were examined in 12 streams in the Gaspé Peninsula, Québec, Canada, that ranged in watershed defoliation from spruce budworm. Hierarchical partitioning models were used to assess the contributions of watershed and stream variables to these endpoints. Total seasonal algal production ranged fourfold among sites, and cumulative defoliation was the strongest predictor. Consumers from streams with greater defoliation (cumulative or annual) had lower reliance on autochthonous carbon, despite increased algal production, and this effect was greater for brook trout than macroinvertebrates. These findings demonstrate for the first time that insect outbreaks—which alter forest structure and function—also similarly affect downstream aquatic ecosystems by causing changes in the production and contributions of carbon sources. This suggests that insect control strategies and forest management decisions should also consider implications for downstream aquatic ecosystems.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".