Upgrade and Improvement of the TRIUMF ECRIS Charge State Booster
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Recently, the RF system of the TRIUMF electron cyclotron resonance ion source charge state booster (ECRIS CSB) underwent an upgrade to implement two-frequency heating using a single waveguide. The injection and extraction optics, as well as the injection and extraction systems, were carefully modelled and systematically optimized to improve the efficiency and beam quality of the charge state booster. With optimized plasma and beam optics under the single-frequency heating regime, the maximum charge state of the 133 Cs isotope produced was 27+, with the peak of the charge state distribution at Cs 23+ with an efficiency of 8.5 %. However, with the implementation of two-frequency heating, the maximum charge state of Cs that can be produced increased to 32+, and the charge state distribution’s peak shifted to Cs 26+ with an efficiency of 9.1 %. Additionally, the two-frequency heating resulted in a total beam RMS emittance that was approximately half of the one that was measured under the single-frequency heating due to the more pronounced negative potential dip created at the plasma center.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".