The Davis Strait proto-microcontinent: The role of plate tectonic reorganization in continental cleaving
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A prolonged period of rifting and seafloor spreading between Greenland and North America formed the Labrador Sea and Baffin Bay oceanic basins, connected by the Davis Strait. However, disagreement exists regarding the exact plate motions between Greenland and Canada as well as the tectonic evolution of the Davis Strait, with previous models unable to explain the origin of anomalously thick continental crust within the seaway. Here, we present a new plate tectonic reconstruction of Greenland’s separation from Canada, constrained by a new comprehensive set of mid-ocean ridge (MOR) and transform fault lineaments identified using free-air, vertical gradient, and filtered directional gradient maps from the Sandwell and Smith gravity data. Furthermore, the reinterpretation of seismic reflection data offshore West Greenland, along with a new combined crustal thickness model, identifies an isolated terrane of relatively thick (19–24 km) continental crust that was separated from Greenland during a newly recognised phase of E-W extension along West Greenland’s margin. We interpret this continental block as an incompletely rifted microcontinent, which we term the Davis Strait proto-microcontinent. Our reconstruction suggests release of the protomicrocontinent coincided with a change in the spreading orientation from ∼ 58 to 49 Myr and was induced by transpression along a NE-SW trending transform margin that joined the Labrador Sea and Baffin Bay, prior to development of the Ungava Fracture Zone (UFZ). The location of this transform margin is constrained using our crustal thickness model, which demonstrates a sharp NE-SW trending continent-ocean transition across the North Saglek basin. We term this structure the Pre-Ungava Transform Margin (Pre-UTM), which accommodated early NE-SW motion between Greenland and Canada. Our identified mechanism of microcontinent formation may be widely applicable to other microcontinents around the globe, and further study is merited to understand the role of plate motion changes and transpression in microcontinent calving.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".