MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4396922010 · doi:10.1016/j.chom.2024.04.016

Type IV-A3 CRISPR-Cas systems drive inter-plasmid conflicts by acquiring spacers in trans

2024· article· en· W4396922010 on OpenAlexaff
Fabienne Benz, Sarah Camara-Wilpert, Jakob Russel, Katharina G. Wandera, Rimvydė Čepaitė, Manuel Ares-Arroyo, José Vicente Gomes‐Filho, Frank Englert, Johannes A. Kuehn, Silvana Gloor, Mario Rodríguez Mestre, Aline Cuénod, Mònica Aguilà-Sans, Lorrie Maccario, Adrian Egli, Lennart Randau, Patrick Pausch, Eduardo P. C. Rocha, Chase L. Beisel, Jonas Stenløkke Madsen, David Bikard, Alex R. Hall, Søren J. Sørensen, Rafael Pinilla‐Redondo

Bibliographic record

VenueCell Host & Microbe · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicCRISPR and Genetic Engineering
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
FundersHorizon 2020Vilnius UniversityH. Lundbeck A/SHorizon 2020 Framework ProgrammeNovo Nordisk FondenNovo NordiskInstitut PasteurLundbeckfondenEidgenössische Technische Hochschule ZürichAgence Nationale de la RechercheEuropean Regional Development FundEuropean CommissionDeutsche ForschungsgemeinschaftInfrastructures en Biologie Santé et AgronomieSchweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen ForschungLietuvos Mokslo TarybaOxford Nanopore TechnologiesVillum FondenUniversity of Otago
KeywordsPlasmidCRISPRBiologyHorizontal gene transferGeneticsGeneRibonucleoproteinCas9Klebsiella pneumoniaeComputational biologyRNAEscherichia coliGenome

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex
No abstract in any covered source. Its absence is recorded, not treated as a negative.

No abstract. This is not a gap in this database; OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.018

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.268
Teacher spread0.263 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations42
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueCell Host & MicrobeSame topicCRISPR and Genetic EngineeringFrench-language works237,207