Long-Term Neoplastic Risk Associated With Colorectal Strictures in Crohn’s Disease: A Multicenter Study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background and Aims: While the occurrence of colonic stricture in Crohn's disease (CD) always raises concerns about the risk of cancer, the neoplastic risk associated with its stricture remains poorly known. Methods: All consecutive patients with colorectal stricture complicating CD in 3 academic centers between 1993 and 2022 were included in a retrospective cohort. We collected clinical, endoscopic, surgical, and pathology data and information on outcomes. Factors associated with neoplastic stricture were investigated by logistic regression. Results: A total of 88 patients (median age, 25 [interquartile range {IQR}, 19-37] years and median disease duration 12 [4-19] years) with 96 colorectal strictures were included. Strictures were nonpassable by the scope in 61.4% (n = 54) of cases, 70.5% (n = 62) were ulcerated, and 62.5% (n = 55) were symptomatic. Colonic resection and endoscopic balloon dilatation were needed in 47.7% (n = 42) and 28.6% (n = 12) of patients, respectively. After a median follow-up of 21.5 months (IQR [5.5-46.5]), 7 (8%) patients were diagnosed with neoplasia at the colonic stricture site (colonic adenocarcinoma, n = 5; neuroendocrine carcinoma, n = 1; and B-cell lymphoproliferative neoplasia, n = 1), with a median stricture duration at colorectal neoplasia diagnosis of 0 month (IQR [0.0-5.5]). While neoplastic strictures were diagnosed in older patients (58 vs 39 years), with longer disease duration (18 vs 11 years) and frequent obstructive symptoms (57.1% vs 11.1%), no patient-related or stricture-related factor was associated with neoplastic stricture in multivariate analysis. Conclusion: Eight percent of patients with colonic stricture complicating CD developed colorectal cancer. Colorectal cancer and stricture were often diagnosed at the same time and we did not report malignant stricture after 1 year of follow-up.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".