Posture Detection of Heart Disease Using Multi-Head Attention Vision Hybrid (MHAVH) Model
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cardiovascular disease is the leading cause of death globally. This disease causes loss of heart muscles and is also responsible for the death of heart cells, sometimes damaging their functionality. A person’s life may depend on receiving timely assistance as soon as possible. Thus, minimizing the death ratio can be achieved by early detection of heart attack (HA) symptoms. In the United States alone, an estimated 610,000 people die from heart attacks each year, accounting for one in every four fatalities. However, by identifying and reporting heart attack symptoms early on, it is possible to reduce damage and save many lives significantly. Our objective is to devise an algorithm aimed at helping individuals, particularly elderly individuals living independently, to safeguard their lives. To address these challenges, we employ deep learning techniques. We have utilized a vision transformer (ViT) to address this problem. However, it has a significant overhead cost due to its memory consumption and computational complexity because of scaling dot-product attention. Also, since transformer performance typically relies on large-scale or adequate data, adapting ViT for smaller datasets is more challenging. In response, we propose a three-in-one steam model, the Multi-Head Attention Vision Hybrid (MHAVH). This model integrates a real-time posture recognition framework to identify chest pain postures indicative of heart attacks using transfer learning techniques, such as ResNet-50 and VGG-16, renowned for their robust feature extraction capabilities. By incorporating multiple heads into the vision transformer to generate additional metrics and enhance heart-detection capabilities, we leverage a 2019 posture-based dataset comprising RGB images, a novel creation by the author that marks the first dataset tailored for posture-based heart attack detection. Given the limited online data availability, we segmented this dataset into gender categories (male and female) and conducted testing on both segmented and original datasets. The training accuracy of our model reached an impressive 99.77%. Upon testing, the accuracy for male and female datasets was recorded at 92.87% and 75.47%, respectively. The combined dataset accuracy is 93.96%, showcasing a commendable performance overall. Our proposed approach demonstrates versatility in accommodating small and large datasets, offering promising prospects for real-world applications.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".