Stacking pattern transition caused by submarine channel inception and internal levée development
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ABSTRACT The shift from highly amalgamated and laterally offset to aggradational and vertically stacked submarine channels is a pattern that has been widely recognized in seismic reflection datasets as well as in outcropping successions worldwide. However, the sedimentary and stratigraphic details of such an important part of channel evolution and its implications have not been discussed extensively. That gap is addressed here by characterizing a previously undocumented, seismic‐scale outcrop of the Tres Pasos Formation (Magallanes Basin, Chile) that records the transition from a laterally offset/low‐aggradational channel complex to a vertically stacked aggradational complex associated with the development of an internal levée that enhanced channel aggradation. The boundary between the two complexes is defined by a composite erosional surface (up to ca 35 m relief) with two adjacent element‐scale channelized incisions with contrasting sedimentary infills that provide unprecedented insight into this key phase of submarine channel evolution. Observations indicate that, in between these two depositional architecture styles, there is a significant phase of deep incision and bypass. The relief achieved via this deep incision of one or multiple simultaneously active conduits is interpreted to be necessary to set up the conditions for flow stripping and, subsequently, overbank deposition. Finally, the siltstone‐rich intra‐channel lithofacies association observed directly overlying part of the incision is interpreted to represent the stratigraphic expression of the earliest deposits of an active submarine channel preserved due to the abrupt abandonment of this pathway and the development of an adjacent conduit, which resulted in the former being covered with fine‐grained overbank deposits.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".