MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4396937974 · doi:10.3899/jrheum.2024-0391

Health Equity: A Challenging Outcome Measure in Rheumatic Global Health

2024· article· en· W4396937974 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Cinthya Cadena-Trejo, Emilio Motte-García, Paola Montes de Oca-Cuadros, Ingris Peláez‐Ballestas

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Rheumatology · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicGlobal Health Workforce Issues
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIndigenousEquity (law)CohortRheumatoid arthritisMedicineHealth equityRheumatologyFamily medicineHealth carePhysical therapyGeographyNursingPolitical scienceInternal medicinePublic healthEconomic growthEconomics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this issue of The Journal of Rheumatology , Wiens et al1 describe how Indigenous people with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and their unaffected first-degree relatives perceive access to healthcare services in Canada. This was a cohort study with individuals from remote communities and urbanized centers, representatives of which participated in the construction of a questionnaire to explore health accessibility. Data were obtained from a total of 831 complete surveys comprising 7 items among 3 domains (wait, travel, and medications). The authors analyzed a binary outcome (overall access difficulty), defined as a perceived moderate/big problem in one or more items of a specific domain. These are main results of this study: A higher overall access difficulty in patients with RA from remote areas was found compared to those from urban areas; this difference was present in all 3 domains. The length of disease had no effect on access difficulty, whereas disability showed a trend toward more problems with healthcare access. Meanwhile, older age, female sex, and living in a rural community were important factors for access difficulty, these being more related to the domains of wait and travel. With these results, the authors concluded that healthcare equity is still a problem in Canadian remote communities, especially for First Nations female individuals. Health equity has increasingly become a topic of interest in research and action, shown for example by the surge in articles related to health equity recorded in PubMed, from around 5000 in the mid-1960s to over 130,000 in recent years. The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has also contributed to this boom through calls for research and action that specifically integrate this perspective.2 Since health equity was first formally defined by Whitehead in 1992, … Address correspondence to Dr. I. Peláez-Ballestas, Dr. Balmis 148, Col. Doctores, Cuahtémoc 06720, Mexico City, Mexico. Email: pelaezin{at}gmail.com.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.018
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.041
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.018
Threshold uncertainty score0.094

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0180.041
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0040.006
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0030.003
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.096
GPT teacher head0.499
Teacher spread0.403 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Rheumatology→Same topicGlobal Health Workforce Issues→French-language works237,207→