Interface Effects in the Stability of 2D Silica, Silicide, and Silicene on Pt(111) and Rh(111)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Ultrathin two-dimensional silica films have been suggested as highly defined conductive models for fundamental studies on silica-supported catalyst particles. Key requirements in this context are closed silica films that isolate the gas phase from the underlying metal substrate and stability under reaction conditions. Here, we present silica bilayer films grown on Pt(111) and Rh(111) and characterize them by scanning tunneling microscopy and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy. We provide the first report of silica bilayer films on Rh(111) and have further successfully prepared fully closed films on Pt(111). Interestingly, surface and interface silicide phases play a decisive role in both cases: On platinum, closed films can be stabilized only when silicon is deposited in excess, which results in an interfacial silicide or silicate layer. We show that these silica films can also be grown directly from a surface silicide phase. In the case of rhodium, the silica phase is less stable and can be reduced to a silicide in reductive environments. Though similar in appearance to the "silicene" phases that have been controversially discussed on Ag(111), we conclude that an interpretation of the phase as a surface silicide is more consistent with our data. Finally, we show that the silica film on platinum is stable in 0.8 mbar CO but unstable at elevated temperatures. We thus conclude that these systems are only suitable as model catalyst supports to a limited extent.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".