MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4396941301 · doi:10.1109/jiot.2024.3401236

HALO: HVAC Load Forecasting With Industrial IoT and Local–Global-Scale Transformer

2024· article· en· W4396941301 on OpenAlexaff
Cheng Pan, Cong Zhang, Edith C.‐H. Ngai, Jiangchuan Liu, Bo Li

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Internet of Things Journal · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicEnergy Load and Power Forecasting
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHVACComputer scienceTransformerAir conditioningEfficient energy useReal-time computingReliability engineeringVoltageElectrical engineeringEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The evolution of Internet-of-Things (IoT) is fostering the use of intelligent controls for energy conservation. Yet, the efficacy of these strategies is largely tied to diverse load forecasting algorithms. Given the significant contribution of heating, ventilation, and air-conditioning (HVAC) systems to global energy consumption, accurate forecasting of HVAC power usage is crucial for improving overall energy efficiency. However, real-world HVAC load forecasting, bolstered by various IoT devices, is complicated by multiple factors: data variability, power load fluctuations, electronic phenomena (e.g., zero drifts), and the increased time complexity and larger model sizes required to manage accumulating historical data. To address these challenges, we first present an in-depth measurement study on the characteristics of HVAC load at a minute scale based on HVAC data collected in six locations. We propose HALO, a transformer-based framework specifically designed for forecasting HVAC load. HALO incorporates an adaptive data pre-processing stage and a local-global-scale transformer-based load forecasting stage, enabling precise forecasting of HVAC load and optimization of energy utilization. Evaluation based on real-world data traces from a prototype application demonstrates that the proposed framework significantly outperforms existing models.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.892
Threshold uncertainty score0.694

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.213
Teacher spread0.194 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Internet of Things JournalSame topicEnergy Load and Power ForecastingFrench-language works237,207