Relativistic Quantum Chemical Investigation of Actinide Covalency Measured by Electron Paramagnetic Resonance Spectroscopy
Bibliographic record
Abstract
High Resolution Image Download MS PowerPoint Slide We investigate actinide covalency effects in two [AnCp tt 3 ] (An = Th, U) complexes recently studied with pulsed electron paramagnetic resonance spectroscopy, using the Hyperion package to obtain relativistic hyperfine coupling constants from relativistic multiconfigurational wave functions. 1 H and 13 C HYSCORE simulations using the computed parameters show excellent agreement with the experimental data, highlighting the accuracy of modern relativistic ab initio methods. The extent of covalency indicated from the calculations on [ThCp tt 3 ] is in agreement with the original report based on traditional spectral fitting methods, while the covalency in [UCp tt 3 ] is found to be previously overestimated. The latter is due to the paramagnetic spin–orbit effect that arises naturally in a relativistic theory of hyperfine coupling and yet was not accounted for in the original study, thus highlighting the necessity of relativistic approaches for the interpretation of magnetic resonance data pertaining to actinides.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".