MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

L’ART À LA HAVANE AU TEMPS DE L’INFLATION ET DE LA CRISE ÉCONOMIQUE

2024· article· fr· W4396985946 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
André Seleanu

Bibliographic record

VenueRevue Possibles · 2024
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicArt History and Market Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolitical sciencePhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Par André Seleanu (membre de l'AICA, Association Internationale des Critiques d'art) À Cuba, l'année 2023 a été marquée par une crise économique et financière aigüe.Le tourisme, de provenance canadienne en grande partie, source primordiale de revenus pour l'île de la Caraïbe, a connu une grave baisse à la suite du ralentissement économique mondial et des mesures prophylactiques suscitées par la pandémie du COVID en 2021 et 2022.En 2023, même si la plupart des restrictions du COVID ont été graduellement enlevées, les revenus touristiques n'atteignaient même pas quarante pour cent de leur niveau d'avant la pandémie.La situation de la guerre en Ukraine, qui sévit depuis février 2022, frappe fort également : les prix mondiaux du blé ont vertigineusement augmenté à cause du blocus russe des ports ukrainiens sur la mer Noire ; la Russie a imposé manu militari l'embargo sur les exportations du blé de l'Ukraine, grand producteur de céréales, comme d'ailleurs son voisin russe.Il est difficile de concevoir que le prix du pain à La Havane ait quadruplé en deux ans.C'est aussi le cas pour la viande et le riz, d'autres aliments de base du peuple cubain.À ces infortunes, il faut ajouter la poursuite de l'embargo commercial américain contre Cuba, qui sévit depuis la prise du pouvoir par les révolutionnaires en 1960.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.105
Threshold uncertainty score0.208

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0050.008
Scholarly communication0.0160.005
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0040.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0160.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.265
Teacher spread0.244 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRevue PossiblesSame topicArt History and Market AnalysisFrench-language works237,207