MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4396989414 · doi:10.1681/asn.20223311s1259b

Multi-Ancestry Proteo-Genomic Association Study of eGFR

2022· article· en· W4396989414 on OpenAlexaff
Matthew B. Lanktree, Nicolas Perrot, Andrew Smyth, Sukrit Narula, Marie Pigeyre, Joan C. Krepinsky, Salim Yusuf, Guillaume Paré

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the American Society of Nephrology · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicCancer, Hypoxia, and Metabolism
Canadian institutionsMcMaster UniversityPopulation Health Research Institute
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineAssociation (psychology)Internal medicinePsychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Reduced eGFR impacts the concentration of proteins circulating in the plasma. Biomarkers may be released during injury without being harmful themselves. Thus, biomarker studies of CKD are prone to confounding by reverse causation. The concentration of plasma protein biomarkers is also influenced by genetic variation. As genotypes are static from birth, life-long differences in genetically predicted protein concentration can be used to identify potentially causal pathogenic or protective proteins while minimizing confounding and reverse causality. Jointly considering the impact of multiple variants on life-long protein concentration can discover novel associations in addition to variants identified in genome-wide association studies (GWAS). In a proteogenomic association study, we sought to test the impact of genetically predicted variation in 1,161 plasma proteins on eGFR. Methods: We searched for cis protein quantitative trait loci (pQTL) genetic variants associated with the concentration of 1,161 plasma proteins in a multi-ancestry sample of 10,753 participants from the Prospective Urban and Rural Epidemiological (PURE) study. Using two-sample Mendelian randomization, we tested if pQTL variants were also associated with eGFR and kidney traits in >1 million participants of published GWAS. We also examined colocalization of pQTL signals and eGFR GWAS results and the phenomewide impact of genetically altered concentration of the identified proteins. Results: 419 pQTL instruments were constructed in PURE including 4665 genetic variants. In GWAS data, genetically altered concentration of 27 protein biomarkers was associated with eGFR (P < 9.5 x 10-5). UMOD was the strongest signal, a positive control of the analysis. Six of the significant biomarkers were previously identified in GWAS; 12 were in identified loci but the causal gene under the GWAS peak was unknown; and 9 loci were unidentified in GWAS. Novel biomarker associations with eGFR include interesting biological candidates such as inhibin beta chain C, a subunit of activins, and proteinase-3, the antigen in PR3-ANCA vasculitis. Conclusions: Using a proteo-genomic association study, 27 biomarkers whose genetically predicted concentration were causally associated with changes in kidney function and risk of kidney disease including interesting biological candidates. Funding: Commercial Support - Bayer

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.277
Teacher spread0.260 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the American Society of Nephrology→Same topicCancer, Hypoxia, and Metabolism→French-language works237,207→