MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4396989596 · doi:10.1681/asn.20223311s1236c

Variation in Hemoglobin Distribution in Patients With CKD: The International Network of CKD Cohorts (iNET-CKD)

2022· article· en· W4396989596 on OpenAlexaff
Mark Canney, Dilshani Induruwage, Mila Tang, Lee Er, Yinshan Zhao, Natália Alencar de Pinho, Bénédicte Stengel, Maarten W. Taal, Janis M. Dionne, Harold I. Feldman, Thomas F. Hiemstra, Anna Richards, Ognjenka Djurdjev, Adeera Levin, I. CKD Investigators

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the American Society of Nephrology · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHemoglobinopathies and Related Disorders
Canadian institutionsBC Children's HospitalUniversity of British ColumbiaOttawa Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHemoglobinVariation (astronomy)Kidney diseaseInternal medicineMedicinePhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Hemoglobin (Hb) has a narrow target range in patients with CKD but little is known about geographical differences in Hb distribution. The aims of this global collaborative study were to compare the distribution of Hb across international CKD populations and evaluate predictors of Hb. Methods: Two-stage individual participant data meta-analysis of cross-sectional data from participating iNET-CKD cohorts. Included participants were >18 years with nondialysis CKD (eGFR <60 mL/min). Using a standardized protocol with harmonized variable definitions, the relationships between candidate predictors and Hb were evaluated in linear regression models and estimates were subsequently pooled in a random effects model. Results: A total of 54,368 participants from 19 cohorts (median eGFR 17 to 49 mL/min) were included with broad geographic representation. Hb values varied substantially among the cohorts even within strata of eGFR and sex (Figure). Across the eGFR range, women had a lower Hb compared to men; however, these differences were smaller at lower eGFR (mean difference 13.2 g/L (95% CI 10.8-15.6) at eGFR of 60 mL/min versus 5.2 g/L (95% CI 3.5-7.0) at eGFR of 15 mL/min, p<0.001 for interaction). In a multivariable model, lower eGFR, female sex, older age, lower body mass index and diabetic kidney disease were independent predictors of a lower Hb value, but this only explained a minority of variance in Hb (median R2 of 21% [range 7 to 44%] across the cohorts).Figure:: Hemoglobin distribution among international CKD cohorts by eGFR category and sex.Conclusions: There are substantial regional differences in Hb distribution among individuals with CKD. The majority of variance in Hb is unexplained by demographics, GFR or comorbidities. A better understanding of international variation in Hb, and the factors that contribute to it, could change the way Hb values are interpreted in CKD. Funding: Commercial Support - GSK

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.012
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.011
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.063

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0120.011
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.006
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.214
Teacher spread0.209 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the American Society of NephrologySame topicHemoglobinopathies and Related DisordersFrench-language works237,207