MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4396989893 · doi:10.1681/asn.20223311s1184b

Voclosporin for Lupus Nephritis: Assessment of Long-Term Safety and Efficacy Including Renal Outcome Over 3 Years of Treatment in the Phase 3 AURORA 1 and AURORA 2 Studies

2022· article· en· W4396989893 on OpenAlexaff
Samir V. Parikh, Cristina Arriens, Lucy S. Hodge, Christopher M. Mela, Henry Leher

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the American Society of Nephrology · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSystemic Lupus Erythematosus Research
Canadian institutionsAurinia (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLupus nephritisMedicineTerm (time)Outcome (game theory)Internal medicineIntensive care medicineUrologyDiseasePhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: In AURORA 1, adding voclosporin to mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) and low-dose steroids led to significant reductions in proteinuria at 1 year in patients with lupus nephritis (LN). We report on the recently completed AURORA 2 study evaluating voclosporin compared to placebo in patients treated for an additional 2 years after AURORA 1. Methods: Patients with LN completing AURORA 1 were eligible to continue on the same double-blinded treatment of voclosporin or placebo in AURORA 2; all patients recieved MMF and low-dose steroids. Outcomes assessed over the 3 year treatment period of both studies included adverse events (AEs), eGFR, urine protein-creatinine ratio (UPCR), good renal outcome and renal flare. Good renal outcome was defined based on achievement of an adequate response (i.e. sustained reduction in UPCR to ≤0.7 mg/mg) and without renal flare (i.e. an increase to UPCR >1 mg/mg from a post-response UPCR of <0.2 mg/mg or an increase to UPCR >2 mg/mg from a post-response UPCR of 0.2 to 1.0 mg/mg), as adjudicated by a blinded Clinical Endpoints Committee. Results: Overall rates of serious AEs in the voclosporin (26.7% of 116 patients) and control arm (28.0% of 100 patients) were similar. There were no deaths in the voclosporin arm during AURORA 2; four deaths occured in the control arm (pulmonary embolism, n=1; coronavirus infection, n=3). Mean corrected eGFR was within the normal range and stable over the study period. The reductions in UPCR achieved in AURORA 1 were maintained in AURORA 2 and significantly more patients in the voclosporin arm achieved a good renal outcome (66.4% in voclosporin vs 54.0% in control; p-value=0.045). Renal flare occurred in 24 of 101 patients with adequate response in the voclosporin arm and 19 of 73 patients in the control arm (23.8% in voclosporin vs 26.0% in control; p-value=0.662); 69.8% of all patients with renal flares completed study treatment. Conclusions: Voclosporin was well-tolerated over three years of treatment. The significant reductions in proteinuria initially achieved in AURORA 1 were maintained throughout AURORA 2 and more patients in the voclosporin arm achieved a good renal outcome. These data provide evidence of a long-term treatment benefit of voclosporin in patients with lupus nephritis. Funding: Commercial Support - Aurinia Pharmaceuticals Inc.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.016
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.016
Threshold uncertainty score0.086

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0160.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.003
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.073
GPT teacher head0.427
Teacher spread0.354 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the American Society of NephrologySame topicSystemic Lupus Erythematosus ResearchFrench-language works237,207