MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4396990424 · doi:10.1681/asn.20223311s1637a

Onconephrology, an Essential Subspecialty: Experience of a University Hospital Center

2022· article· en· W4396990424 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Sheila Bermejo, Mónica Bolufer, Davide Viggiano, Ana Callejo, Marina López-Martínez, Ander Vergara, Irene Agraz, Oriol Bestard, María José Soler

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the American Society of Nephrology · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAdvances in Oncology and Radiotherapy
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSubspecialtyCenter (category theory)MedicineGeneral surgeryFamily medicineChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Kidney complications of cancer patients and cancer in renal patients have increased in recent years. This study evaluates the characteristics of the patients referred to the Onco-Nephrology Unit from January 2021 to December 2021, studying the cognitive and mood status of these patients. Methods: This is a prospective observational study of the Onco-Nephrology consultation at our hospital during 2021. Clinical and analytical characteristics of the patients and clinical indication for referral were analyzed. In addition, sleep quality, mood and cognitive status were assessed using validated rating scales(Epsworth, Geriatric Depression Scale and Montreal). Results: Seventy-four patients were evaluated, mean age was 69.6(±11) years, 41(55.4%) men, 47(63.5%) had hypertension, 18(24.3%) diabetics, and 11(14.9%) were affected by heart disease. In addition, creatinine 1.93(±1.1)mg/dl, eGFR 39.97(±20.3) mL/min, proteinuria 187[29-515.9]mg/g, and 4(5.4%) had microhematuria. The most frequent cancers were intestinal, gynecological and mammary with 12.16%(n=9) each. 58.3%(n=42) of patients had metastatic disease. 48.7%(n=36) received chemotherapy and 58.1%(n=43) targeted therapies. Platinum was the most frequently used chemotherapy and anti-VEGF in terms of targeted therapies. The most frequent clinical indication for referral was acute renal failure(n=36;48.7%). Rating scales were obtained in 51 patients: 49%(n=25) were snorers, followed by 17.6%(n=9) with insomnia and 11.8%(n=6) with OSAS. 27 patients(36.5%) had cognitive impairment. Mild depression was detected in 13 cases(25.5%) and moderate depression in 11.6%(n=6). 21 renal biopsies were performed, the most frequent diagnosis was acute interstitial nephritis(71.4%, n=15) followed by thrombotic microangiopathy(19% n=4). A total of 15 patients(20.3%) died during the year. Conclusions: Most patients referred to Onco-Nephrology are affected by advanced oncological disease and consequently had a high mortality. The most frequent indication for referral was acute kidney injury(48.7%). Comprehensive patient care is important, given the prevalence of depressive syndrome. Onco-Nephrology is an example of a comprehensive and multidisciplinary approach to improve the survival and quality of life of patients with advanced cancer and renal disease.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.022

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.314
Teacher spread0.305 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the American Society of Nephrology→Same topicAdvances in Oncology and Radiotherapy→French-language works237,207→