MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4396992756 · doi:10.1681/asn.20213210s1721c

The Association of CKD Severity with Stroke Subtype Using the TOAST Classification

2021· article· en· W4396992756 on OpenAlexaffabout
Salmi T. Noor, Sarah E. Bota, Anna E. Clarke, Dearbhla Kelly, Greg Knoll, Manish M. Sood

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the American Society of Nephrology · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicArtificial Intelligence in Healthcare
Canadian institutionsOttawa HospitalInstitute for Clinical Evaluative SciencesUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineAssociation (psychology)Stroke (engine)Internal medicinePsychologyPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Ischemic stroke affects approximately 67.5 million people worldwide. The risk of acute ischemic stroke largely increases with advanced chronic kidney disease (CKD). However, whether the risk of specific ischemic stroke subtype varies with declining kidney function remains unclear. The purpose of this study was to assess the association between ischemic stroke subtypes (cardioembolic [CE], arterial, lacunar, other) classified using the Trial of Org 10172 in Acute Stroke Treatment (TOAST) and CKD stage. Methods: This is a cross-sectional, retrospective cohort study of adults (≥18 years) with an ischemic stroke who presented to the emergency department in Ontario, Canada between April 1, 2002- March 31, 2013 and who had an inpatient serum creatinine measurement or were on chronic dialysis. All patients captured in the stroke registry with an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) were included and CKD severity was categorised as ≥60, 30-59, <30 mL/min/1.73m2 or chronic dialysis. Results: A total of 17,434 individuals with an ischemic stroke were included (58.9% eGFR ≥60, 34.7% eGFR 30-59, 6.0% eGFR<30, 0.5% on chronic dialysis; mean age of 73 years; 48% female). Among patients with an eGFR 30-59 (50.4%) and < 30 (50.6%), CE stroke was more common compared to those with an eGFR >60 (36.8%) or on chronic dialysis patients (37.3%). The odds of CE stroke vs. non-CE stroke were eGFR 30-59 odds ratio (OR) 1.20 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.10-1.31, eGFR<30 OR 1.21 95% CI 1.02-1.44, dialysis OR 0.86 95% CI 0.48-1.57, eGFR>60 referent). We found lower adjusted odds of lacunar stroke in those with advanced CKD (lacunar vs. non-lacunar: eGFR 30-59 OR 0.85 95% CI 0.77-0.93, eGFR<30 OR 0.73 95% CI 0.61-0.88, dialysis OR 1.25 95% CI 0.68-2.28, eGFR>60 referent). In subgroup analyses (eGFR>=30 and <30), CE strokes were also more common in those >65 years, with atrial fibrillation, no anticoagulation or an INR <2. Conclusions: Chronic kidney disease (eGFR<60, pre-dialysis CKD) is associated with a higher odds of CE stroke compared to patients with normal to high kidney function or those on chronic dialysis. Normal/mildly decreased eGFR were associated with the development of lacunar strokes. Detailed stroke subtyping in CKD may therefore provide mechanistic insights and refocus treatment strategies in this vulnerable group.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.123
Threshold uncertainty score0.657

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.105
GPT teacher head0.427
Teacher spread0.322 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the American Society of NephrologySame topicArtificial Intelligence in HealthcareFrench-language works237,207