MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4396992811 · doi:10.1681/asn.20213210s1264a

Phase Ib Study of the Soluble Guanylate Cyclase Activator BI 685509 in Patients with Diabetic Kidney Disease

2021· article· en· W4396992811 on OpenAlexaff
David Z.I. Cherney, Dick de Zeeuw, Hiddo J.L. Heerspink, Marc Desch, A Wenz, Friedrich Schulze, Masaomi Nangaku

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the American Society of Nephrology · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicDiabetes Treatment and Management
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGuanylate cyclaseActivator (genetics)MedicineInternal medicineKidney diseaseDiabetes mellitusDiseaseKidneyEndocrinologyGuanylate cyclase 2CGastroenterologyReceptor

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Soluble guanylate cyclase (sGC) plays a key role in the kidney nitric oxide-cyclic guanosine monophosphate (NO-cGMP) pathway. Increased albuminuria is associated with kidney function loss. The NO-independent sGC activator BI 685509 lowers albuminuria in experimental models. This Phase Ib study (NCT03165227) assessed the safety and efficacy of BI 685509 in patients with diabetic kidney disease and albuminuria. Methods: This placebo (PBO)-controlled, multiple dose study enrolled patients with type 1 or 2 diabetes, estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) 20-75 mL/min/1.73m2 and urinary albumin creatinine ratio (UACR) 200-3500 mg/g. Patients (N=74) were randomised to three active dose groups receiving oral BI 685509 (tested doses after titration: 1 mg three times daily [TID], n=20; 3 mg once daily [QD], n=19; 3 mg TID, n=20) or PBO (n=15) for 28 days. Efficacy was assessed by the proportion of responders, defined as patients with ≥20% decrease from baseline in UACR measured in first morning void (UACRFMV) and 10-h (UACR10h) (PBO, 3 mg QD and 3 mg TID only) urine. Results: At baseline, median eGFR was 47.0 mL/min/1.73m2 and median UACR was 641.5 mg/g, although this varied between groups. Drug-related adverse events (AEs) occurred in 12 patients (16.2%; BI 685509 15.3%, PBO 20.0%); the most frequent were hypotension (4.1%) and diarrhoea (2.7%). AEs leading to study discontinuation occurred in 4 patients (5.4%; BI 685509 5.1%, PBO 6.7%). Compared with PBO, the proportion of patients receiving BI 685509 classed as responders was higher (Figure). Conclusions: BI 685509 treatment was generally well-tolerated with over 50% of patients in the 3 mg QD and 3 mg TID dose groups appearing to show a response in UACR10h. Funding: Commercial Support - Boehringer IngelheimProportion of responders (≥20% decrease from baseline in UACR)

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Non-randomized trial · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.019

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.262
Teacher spread0.252 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNon-randomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the American Society of NephrologySame topicDiabetes Treatment and ManagementFrench-language works237,207