MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4396994563 · doi:10.1681/asn.20213210s142b

Identification of Molecularly Distinct Sub-Phenotypes in AKI and Association with Long-Term Clinical Outcomes

2021· article· en· W4396994563 on OpenAlexaff
Pavan K. Bhatraju, David K. Prince, Sherry G. Mansour, T. Alp İkizler, Edward D. Siew, Amit X. Garg, Alan S. Go, James S. Kaufman, Paul L. Kimmel, Steven G. Coca, Chirag R. Parikh, Mark M. Wurfel, Jonathan Himmelfarb

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the American Society of Nephrology · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicRenin-Angiotensin System Studies
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIdentification (biology)Association (psychology)PhenotypeTerm (time)MedicineComputational biologyBiologyGeneticsGenePsychologyPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: AKI is a heterogeneous clinical syndrome with varying causes, pathophysiology and diverse clinical outcomes; however, staging AKI by serum creatinine does not fully capture underlying patient heterogeneity. Our goal was to identify AKI sub-phenotypes more tightly linked to underlying pathophysiology and long-term clinical outcomes. Methods: We independently applied latent class analysis (LCA) and k-Means clustering to 29 clinical, plasma and urinary biomarker data measured during hospitalization to identify AKI sub-phenotypes in the ASSESS-AKI study. AKI subphenotype associations were examined with the composite of major adverse kidney events (MAKE), defined as incident or progressive chronic kidney disease, long-term dialysis, or all-cause death during study follow-up. Results: Among 769 AKI patients both LCA and k-Means clustering identified two AKI sub-phenotypes. Class 1 was characterized by a higher prevalence of prior congestive heart failure and favorable blood inflammatory and urinary tubular injury biomarkers, while class 2 was characterized by higher rates of prior chronic kidney disease and less favorable biomarkers. After a median follow-up of 4.7 years, the risk for MAKE was higher with class 2 (HR 1.41; 95% CI, 1.08 to 1.84) compared with class 1 adjusting for demographics, hospital level factors and KDIGO Stage of AKI. The higher risk of MAKE among class 2 was explained by a higher risk of chronic kidney disease progression and dialysis (Figure 1). Conclusions: In this analysis, we identify two molecularly distinct AKI subphenotypes with differing risk of long-term outcomes, independent of current criteria to risk stratify AKI. Future identification of AKI sub-phenotypes may facilitate linking therapies to underlying pathophysiology to prevent long-term sequalae after AKI. Funding: NIDDK SupportFigure 1a.: 29 different continuous vanables used in clustering analyses by AKI sub-phenotypes. Indivual continuous variables were placed on a z scale with a mean of zero and standard deviation of one. Variables are presented from top to bottom in order of maximum separation between class 1 and 2.Figure 1b.: Kaplan-Meier curves for major adverse kidney events (MAKE), CKD incidence, CKD progression, dialysis and death by AKI sub-phenotypes

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.321
Teacher spread0.302 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the American Society of NephrologySame topicRenin-Angiotensin System StudiesFrench-language works237,207