MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4396994773 · doi:10.1681/asn.20213210s1511c

An International Delphi Survey on IgA Nephropathy: Results from the DEFINE Physicians Study

2021· article· en· W4396994773 on OpenAlexaffabout
Marina Vivarelli, Jürgen Floege, Jonathan Barratt, Rosanna Coppo, Richard Lafayette, Jai Radhakrishnan, Brad H. Rovin, David T. Selewski, Vladimı́r Tesař, Marcello Tonelli, Heather N. Reich

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the American Society of Nephrology · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicEosinophilic Esophagitis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoUniversity Health NetworkUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNephropathyDelphi methodMedicineSurvey researchFamily medicinePsychologyComputer scienceEndocrinologyApplied psychologyArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: It is unclear whether treatment guidelines for patients with IgA nephropathy (IgAN) are uniformly applied in clinical practice. The DEFINE: Physicians initiative sought to describe the opinions of nephrologists about the pathophysiology, diagnosis, and optimal management of adult and pediatric patients with IgAN. Methods: A 2-round Delphi survey was distributed to nephrologists in Canada, France, Germany, Italy, Spain, the UK, and the US. A 1-9 Likert scale (9=strongly agree) was used to score statements. Consensus was defined as median and mean score ≥7, and ≥75% of participants scoring agreement (ie, score 7-9). Feedback collected in Round 1 was used to revise statements not achieving high consensus (≥90% agreement) for retesting in Round 2. Moderate consensus was defined as 75-89% agreement. Results: In Round 1, 207 participants with a median clinical experience of 18 years (range, 5-49) rated 19 statements about IgAN. Half (50%) of participants worked in nonacademic settings. All statements met criteria for moderate or high consensus after the second round. Notably, a statement on corticosteroid therapy in adult patients reached moderate consensus after Round 1 and was divided into 2 parts in Round 2 (Figure 1). Both revised statements reached levels of agreement similar to the original statement. In contrast, a statement on corticosteroid and cyclophosphamide use in adults with rapidly progressive glomerulonephritis and 2 statements on corticosteroid therapy in pediatric patients reached high consensus in Round 1 (Figure 1).Figure 1Conclusions: High consensus regarding clinical decisions and the importance of controlling proteinuria in IgAN was observed in this Delphi survey. Although the level of consensus related to corticosteroid use was lower for adult patients vs pediatric patients, the level of consensus was relatively high for both groups. Funding: Commercial Support - Travere Therapeutics, Inc.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.059
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.069
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.059
Threshold uncertainty score0.310

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0590.069
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.006
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.321
Teacher spread0.288 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the American Society of NephrologySame topicEosinophilic EsophagitisFrench-language works237,207