MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4396997015 · doi:10.1681/asn.20203110s1726a

B-Cell Maturation Phenotypes and Time Post-Transplant

2020· article· en· W4396997015 on OpenAlexaff
Alcino Gama, Olivier Désy, Stéphanie Béland, François Bouchard-Boivin, Sacha A. De Serres

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the American Society of Nephrology · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicImmunodeficiency and Autoimmune Disorders
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhenotypeMedicineBiologyImmunologyGeneticsGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Over the past decade, B cell participation in allograft response has been progressively elucidated. Beside the occurrence of DSA (donor-specific alloantibodies), different patterns of B cell phenotypes are also being related to graft outcome. Loss of naive B cells and appearance of memory B cells have been linked to chronic rejection and ultimately to graft loss. Here we show the impact of time post-transplant on phenotypic B cell changes, particularly regarding different distributions of naive B cells. Methods: Single-center, observational cohort of 82 kidney transplant recipients (KTr), adults and clinically stable. Blood samples were collected between January 2015 and November 2018. Peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) were isolated and analyzed on flow cytometry. B cells (CD19+) were stained for CD38 and IgD and classified according to Bm classification (IgD vs CD38). Results: The median time post-transplant was 2.9 [0.9-9.89] years and the mean age was 54±13 years. 63% of the patients were males and mean eGFR was 49±17mL/min. B cells absolute counts were lower in later phases post-transplant (R -0.4, p<0.01). Among all B cell subtypes, Bm2 compartment (comprised mainly by naive B cells) had the most significant reduction in both absolute counts (R -0.62, p<0.01) and relative percentage (R -0.58, p<0.01) over time. On the opposite, mature B cells (both Bm5 and early Bm5 compartments) absolute counts did not differ over time (R -0.04 and 0.11 respectively, p>0.05) whereas the percentages of them were positively correlated with time posttransplant (R 0.40 and 0.56 respectively, p<0.01). Linear regression model showed that the absolute reduction in Bm2 cell compartment (i.e. naive B cells) was independent of age, sex, graft function and immunosuppression scheme. Conclusions: Patients with longer time post-transplant have fewer circulating peripheral B cells. Phenotypic analysis of B cell subsets reveals that this reduction is due to an absolute decrease in naive B cells counts. Mature B cell absolute numbers, on the other hand, did not change significantly. Either exhaustion due to long-term immunosuppression or immunologic accommodation due to chronic alloantigen exposure could explain these observations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.791
Threshold uncertainty score0.294

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.200
Teacher spread0.194 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the American Society of NephrologySame topicImmunodeficiency and Autoimmune DisordersFrench-language works237,207