MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4396997183 · doi:10.1681/asn.20203110s1689c

Chronic Neurological Impairment in Patients with Thrombotic Thrombocytopenic Purpura: Preliminary Findings in a Comprehensive MRI Protocol

2020· article· en· W4396997183 on OpenAlexaff
Jeff Hamilton, Michael T. Jurkiewicz, Jonathan D. Thiessen, Shih‐Han S. Huang

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the American Society of Nephrology · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicComplement system in diseases
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsThrombotic thrombocytopenic purpuraMedicinePurpura (gastropod)PediatricsPathologyInternal medicinePlatelet

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (TTP) is a life-threating blood disorder characterized by insufficient activity in ADAMTS13 (a disintegrin and metalloproteinase with thrombospondin type 1 motif, member 13). This protein prevents blood clotting, so in TTP there is spontaneous clotting throughout the microvasculature. Treatment includes plasma exchange therapy and immunosuppressants to improve fever, thrombocytopenia, and kidney failure. However, neurological changes, such as seizures and confusion, persist. There is limited research on TTP on the brain but it is known that TTP presents similar pathology to stroke. This study aims to better understand the longterm impact of TTP on the brain using a comprehensive magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) protocol and cognitive testing. Methods: 13 patients (5 male, mean age 44.5) in hematological remission were recruited. Participants had a 65-minute MRI scan (Siemens mMR Biograph 3T) based on best-practice guidelines for imaging stroke. The protocol included five qualitative acqusitions and three quantitative acquisitions. Participants also completed a 40-minute cognitive test (Cambridge Brain Sciences) to assess cognitive impairment. Results: Table 1 summarizes the findings across qualitative acquisitions. The most salient findings were the white matter hyperintensities seen in the T2 FLAIR in Image 1. 12 participants completed the cognitive testing and there is evidence of cognitive impairment. Conclusions: Patients will be scanned again at six and twelve months. Agematched healthy controls will be recruited before drawing conclusions on quantitative metrics, namely the amount of white matter. These early results are promising for better understanding the implications of TTP on the brain. Funding: Private Foundation SupportSummary of qualitative findings

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.036
Threshold uncertainty score0.574

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.266
Teacher spread0.248 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the American Society of NephrologySame topicComplement system in diseasesFrench-language works237,207