MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4396997578 · doi:10.1681/asn.20203110s1229a

Effects of the SGLT2 Inhibitor Dapagliflozin on Proteinuria in Non-Diabetic Patients with CKD (DIAMOND): A Randomized Double-Blind Cross-Over Trial

2020· article· en· W4396997578 on OpenAlexaffabout
Hiddo J.L. Heerspink, Claire C. J. Dekkers, David Cherney

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the American Society of Nephrology · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicDiabetes Treatment and Management
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoUniversity Health Network
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDapagliflozinProteinuriaMedicineUrologyDiabetes mellitusRandomized controlled trialInternal medicineDouble blindEndocrinologyType 2 diabetesKidneyPlaceboPathologyAlternative medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Sodium glucose co-transporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibition decreases albuminuria and reduces the risk of kidney disease progression in patients with type 2 diabetes. These benefits are unlikely mediated by improvements in glycemic control alone. We therefore examined the renal effects of the SGLT2 inhibitor dapagliflozin in patients with proteinuric kidney disease without diabetes. Methods: A multicenter double-blind placebo controlled 6-week crossover study was performed in six hospitals in the Netherlands, Canada, and Malaysia. Patients (18-75 years old), without diagnosis of diabetes, 24-h urinary protein excretion >500 and ≤3500 mg/24h and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) ≥25 ml/min/1.73m2 on stable renin angiotensin system blockade were included. Participants were randomly assigned to one of the two consecutive treatment periods of first placebo and then dapagliflozin 10 mg/day or vice versa. The primary outcome was percentage change from baseline in 24-h proteinuria. The main secondary outcome was change in iohexol measured GFR (mGFR). Results: Fifty-eight patients were screened of whom 53 patients were randomized. Median baseline proteinuria was 1110 mg/24h (IQR 730, 1560) mg/24h; mean mGFR was 58.3 ml/min/1.73m2 (SD 23). The difference in mean proteinuria change from baseline between dapagliflozin and placebo was 0.9% (95% CI: -16.6, 22.1; p=0.93). Compared to placebo, mGFR changed with dapagliflozin treatment by -6.6 ml/min/1.73m2 (95% CI: -9.0, -4.2; p<0.0001) at week 6, which was completely reversible within 6 weeks after dapagliflozin discontinuation. Differences between dapagliflozin and placebo in body weight, systolic blood pressure and hematocrit were -1.5 kg (95% CI: -3.0, -0.03; p=0.0455), -3.6 mmHg (95% CI: -7.6, 0.4; p=0.0775) and 0.02 L/L (95% CI: 0.01, 0.03; p<0.0001). HbA1c did not change. The number of patients with adverse events during dapagliflozin treatment (n=17; 32.1%) and during placebo treatment (n=13; 25.0%) was similar. No hypoglycemic events were reported. Conclusions: Six week treatment with dapagliflozin does not affect proteinuria in patients with chronic kidney disease without diabetes, but did induce acute and reversible decline in mGFR, body weight reduction, and increased hemoconcentration. Funding: Commercial Support - AstraZeneca

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: Randomized trial
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.014

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0040.002
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.263
Teacher spread0.253 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designRandomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the American Society of Nephrology→Same topicDiabetes Treatment and Management→French-language works237,207→