MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4396997852 · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2024.114453

Low- and high-temperature thermal hydrolysis pretreatment for anaerobic digestion of sludge: Process evaluation and fate of emerging pollutants

2024· article· en· W4396997852 on OpenAlexafffund
Seyed Mohammad Mirsoleimani Azizi, Nervana Haffiez, Alsayed Mostafa, Abid Hussain, Mohamed Abdallah, Abdullah Al-Mamun, Amit Bhatnagar, Bipro Ranjan Dhar

Bibliographic record

VenueRenewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAnaerobic Digestion and Biogas Production
Canadian institutionsCarleton UniversityUniversity of Alberta
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsBiosolidsAnaerobic digestionThermal hydrolysisEnvironmental scienceWaste managementHydrolysisPollutantProcess (computing)Pulp and paper industryBiochemical engineeringSewage treatmentChemistrySewage sludge treatmentEnvironmental engineeringEngineeringComputer scienceMethane

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The thermal hydrolysis process is a cutting-edge, widely used technology for the pretreatment of sludge before anaerobic digestion. Previous review articles addressed the mechanisms, optimization, and advantages of thermal hydrolysis for sludge management; however, a holistic comparison between low-temperature and high-temperature thermal hydrolysis processes is still lacking. The review aims to comprehensively examine the impacts of both low-temperature and high-temperature thermal hydrolysis processes on sludge solubilization, subsequent anaerobic digestion process performance and produced biosolids quality. Further, current thermal hydrolysis-related challenges, such as inhibitory compounds and residual ammonia, and their possible solutions are discussed. Moreover, both types of thermal hydrolysis processes are critically evaluated from technical, energetic, and economic standpoints. This review sheds light on the impact of thermal hydrolysis pretreatment on the fate of various emerging pollutants in sludge, a topic overlooked in most previous review articles. Finally, this review highlights the research gaps worthy of coverage in future studies. By compiling and critically analyzing previous studies, this review aims to function as a comprehensive handbook for researchers looking to optimize the selection of the most suitable thermal hydrolysis process based on specific sludge conditions. Enhancing the efficiency of thermal hydrolysis in sludge anaerobic digestion holds the potential for improved sludge management, increased bioenergy recovery, and the generation of high-quality biosolids to address environmental and public health concerns associated with emerging pollutants. Consequently, this review aims to contribute to achieving multiple UN Sustainable Development Goals, including #7 Affordable and Clean Energy, #11 Sustainable Cities and Communities, and #13 Climate Action.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.244
Teacher spread0.236 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations44
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueRenewable and Sustainable Energy ReviewsSame topicAnaerobic Digestion and Biogas ProductionFrench-language works237,207