Barriers and facilitators to transition from pediatric to adult healthcare for immigrant youth with chronic health conditions
Bibliographic record
Abstract
PURPOSE: The objective of this study was to investigate the experience of first- and second- generation immigrant youth living with chronic health conditions in Canada, their parents or caregivers, and healthcare and service providers who care for immigrant youth, regarding the transition from pediatric to adult healthcare. DESIGN AND METHODS: We conducted semi-structured individual interviews and focus groups. Youth were 1st or 2nd generation immigrants, aged 16-25, with pediatric-onset chronic health conditions. Parents or caregivers had raised youth children as described. Providers delivered healthcare or other services to immigrant populations. Thematic analysis was conducted of all transcripts. RESULTS: Twenty youth, 14 parents/caregivers and five service providers participated. Most participants described healthcare transition as very difficult to navigate. Two major themes emerged across participant narratives: 1. Barriers to transition: lack of family experience in Canada, language, discrimination, financial strain, stigma, and long wait times. Some of these barriers are specific to newcomer families, but others are generalizable to the Canadian population. 2. Facilitators of transition: youth independence, youth acting as cultural bridges within their families, and cross-sector support between healthcare, education, social work and settlement services. CONCLUSIONS: Immigrant youth and their families face a broad range of barriers to healthcare transition. The collaborative nature of cross-sector support effectively addressed some of the barriers faced by newcomer families. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Clinicians should provide immigrant youth and their families with accessible information about the health condition and how to navigate the adult healthcare system prior to transition, particularly when language barriers exist.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".