MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4397008049 · doi:10.1016/j.tsf.2024.140391

Comprehensive investigation of thermal induced reorganization of porous-germanium structures

2024· article· en· W4397008049 on OpenAlexaff
Ahmed Ayari, Bouraoui Ilahi, Roxana Arvinte, Tadeáš Hanuš, Laurie Mouchel, Jinyoun Cho, Kristof Dessein, Denis Machon, Abderraouf Boucherif

Bibliographic record

VenueThin Solid Films · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicSilicon Nanostructures and Photoluminescence
Canadian institutionsInstitut interdisciplinaire d'innovation technologiqueUniversité de Sherbrooke
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGermaniumPorosityThermalMaterials scienceEngineering physicsChemical engineeringNanotechnologyChemistryComposite materialMetallurgyEngineeringThermodynamicsPhysicsSilicon

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Porous germanium (PGe) substrates have recently attracted significant attention for the development of lightweight and flexible solar cells and optoelectronic devices. A reliable approach for releasing epitaxial layers based on Germanium and reusing the substrate involves utilizing a bilayer structure of PGe. The growth of such detachable devices holds great potential for integration onto the Si platform. The used structure of PGe is made of a low-porosity layer serving as epitaxial seed on top of high-porosity one used as a weak separation layer. In this work, we investigate the impact of thermal annealing on the PGe morphology for deeper understanding of the mechanisms involved in the formation of the epitaxial seed layer and the voided weak layer underneath. Indeed, thermal-induced reconstruction has been investigated at various annealing temperatures and times for PGe layers with differing porosity levels, encompassing low, high, and gradual porosity profiles. Our findings reveal the formation of a modified substrate at low annealing temperatures, resulting in a suspended membrane on top of the fragile separation layer, rendering it suitable for detachment and subsequent substrate reuse.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.263
Teacher spread0.243 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThin Solid FilmsSame topicSilicon Nanostructures and PhotoluminescenceFrench-language works237,207