MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4397012476 · doi:10.1111/rirt.14297

Creating Gender in the Garden: The Inconstant Partnership of Eve and Adam, BarbaraDeutschmann, T&T Clark, 2022 (ISBN 978‐0‐5677‐0456‐6), xii + 276 pp., hb £85

2024· article· en· W4397012476 on OpenAlexaff
Doreen M. McFarlane

Bibliographic record

VenueReviews in Religion and Theology · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicUrban Agriculture and Sustainability
Canadian institutionsCanadian Sleep Society
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeneral partnershipArtLaw and economicsSociologyPolitical scienceLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This volume, carefully written and well researched by Barbara Deutschmann, is an excellent addition to T&T Clark's Hebrew Bible series.She analyses in detail every aspect of the female, the male, gender assumptions and their relationship as known in the book of Genesis 2-4, seeking out the meaning of sex, gender, partnerships, differences and sameness.This book is a meticulous literary critical study of the texts themselves and the history of their reception up to and into our times.Deutschmann points out that she does wish not only to enter the conversation with twenty-first-century reading communities but also to bring her own perspective as an educated Western woman into the conversation.Deutschmann begins by presenting the questions, assumptions and traditional viewpoints with regard to the Garden of Eden and its dwellers, Eve and Adam, noting how the Garden story resonates with the Wisdom literature.Here, and throughout the volume, she carefully studies each relevant Hebrew word in the text being studied.She points out that this volume will come through a feminist lens which is intended to shine a critical light on relations of power as related to sex/gender relations.She also notes that her methodology will blend exegesis with literary, theological and sociological considerations.She points out that she still always reads the texts as scripture, listening for God's voice.From here, Deutschmann's analysis begins first with regard to the garden as the setting or tableau in which the narrative takes place, noting its similarity to that of the Mesopotamian creation myths.She then looks at the order of creation and investigates the grammatical understanding of the Hebrew words to assist in understanding.Then, most importantly, she studies the establishment of the partnership between woman and man.Chapter Three continues with their partnership in action, the issue of nakedness and clothing and matters regarding the serpent.The fourth chapter examines the entrance of the brothers Cain and Abel into the story and examines the issues of their troubled relationship, as well as the complexity for parents dealing with their children.In Chapter Five, the Eve-Adam partnership is illuminated, and twenty-first-century perspectives are considered.Deutschmann brings in ideas from Foucault, Laqueur, Butler and Fausto-Sterling about sex and gender disparities and how our differentiated understandings of the sexes may affect our translation choices.Chapter Six addresses the gendered male and the gendered female.The seventh chapter moves on to such issues as interrogating patriarchy, Torah, same-sex sexuality, political matters related to sex and sexuality in the books of Ruth and Song of Songs.The eighth chapter looks back on earlier hierarchical and early Christian perspectives, and

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.024

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0040.005
Scholarly communication0.0050.006
Open science0.0000.003
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.277
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueReviews in Religion and TheologySame topicUrban Agriculture and SustainabilityFrench-language works237,207