MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4397025473 · doi:10.1681/asn.20213210s1289b

Health-Related Quality of Life During Dialysis Modality Transitions: A Mixed-Methods Study

2021· article· en· W4397025473 on OpenAlexaffabout
Chance S. Dumaine, Danielle E. Fox, Pietro Ravani, Maria Santana, Jennifer M. MacRae

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the American Society of Nephrology · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicDialysis and Renal Disease Management
Canadian institutionsUniversity of CalgaryUniversity of Saskatchewan
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDialysisModality (human–computer interaction)MedicineQuality of life (healthcare)Intensive care medicineInternal medicineComputer scienceArtificial intelligenceNursing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Dialysis transitions may have an impact on health related quality of life (HRQOL), a patient defined priority for research and clinical care. We measured HRQOL and explored perceptions of adults who were initiating dialysis for the first time or transitioning to a new dialysis modality in a large urban centre in Canada. Methods: In this prospective convergent parallel mixed-methods study we recruited eligible patients who were transitioning to dialysis from pre-care (n=9, incident) or undertaking a dialysis modality change (n=10, prevalent) between July and September 2017. Patients completed the five domains of the Kidney Disease Quality of Life-36 (KDQOL-36) survey on their first day of dialysis treatment or first day of home dialysis training and underwent a semi-structured interview and follow up KDQOL-36 survey at 3 months. Results: 19 patients completed KDQOL-36 at baseline and at 3 months; 15 also participated in an interview. Statistically significant increases in all measured domains of the KDQOL-36 were observed from baseline to three months: “Symptoms” [mean difference (MD)=14.9, p<0.01]; “Effects” (MD=14.3, p<0.01); “Burden” (MD=7.3, p=0.04); “PCS” (MD=7.5, p<0.01); “MCS” (MD=7.2, p=0.04). These patterns of change were similar for both incident and prevalent patients and across the different types of transitions. The qualitative interviews identified the following themes: 1) adapting to new circumstances (tackling change, accepting change), 2) adjusting together 3) trade offs, and 4) challenges of chronicity (the impact of dialysis, living with a complex disease, planning with uncertainty. Conclusions: The transition to a new or different type of dialysis is associated with improvements in HRQOL. In addition, qualitative data provided an in depth understanding of the transition experience, and revealed significant emotional and psychosocial processes that need to be considered during both incident and prevalent dialysis transitions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.009
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.009
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.026
Threshold uncertainty score0.051

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0090.009
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.368
Teacher spread0.338 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the American Society of Nephrology→Same topicDialysis and Renal Disease Management→French-language works237,207→