Evaluating Acetate as a Renoprotective Agent After Kidney Ischemia in a Porcine Model
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Objective:Renoprotection from reperfusion injury appears to be conferred by HIF-2a activation, which can be stimulated by exogenous acetate administration. The study objective was to assess whether administration of acetate in a porcine model can mitigate kidney injury related to ischemia-reperfusion after renal hilar occlusion. Methods:A porcine single-kidney model was created by performing a laparoscopic nephrectomy followed by animal recovery. After 2 days, the animals underwent laparoscopic hilar dissection. Block randomization was used to assign pigs into one of four experimental groups. One treatment block of pigs received 150 mEq of sodium acetate intravenously during 90 minutes of en bloc occlusion of the renal hilum (herein noted as “cross-clamping”). Another block received 0.75 g/kg of oral sodium acetate for 3 days prior to cross-clamping. A third block received no acetate and underwent hilar dissection without cross-clamping (negative control). The final block received no acetate and underwent cross-clamping (positive control). Serum creatinine was used to estimate renal function post-nephrectomy. Results:A total of 16 animals (4 pigs in each group) completed the study protocol. Median pig weight was 34.6 kg. One pig receiving IV acetate was excluded from the final analysis because of unrecoverable renal failure after cross-clamping. There was a significantly lower mean serum creatinine for the IV acetate group compared with the positive control group 72 hours after cross-clamping (p = 0.012). The same effect was not observed for the pigs receiving oral acetate. By day 7, renal function had recovered without significant difference in all groups. Conclusions:We observed that the administration of intravenous acetate conferred a significant renoprotective benefit in our single kidney ischemia-reperfusion porcine model 72 hours after hilar occlusion. This work is hypothesis-generating, and further work in human subjects undergoing renal hilar occlusion during partial nephrectomy is warranted.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".