Surgical management of caesarean scar disorder using different techniques: a scoping review and case series
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Background Caesarean scar disorders (CSDi) are an increasingly recognized consequence of caesarean sections, which can present with secondary infertility. Currently, there is limited data on the management of CSDi, and the subsequent fertility and pregnancy outcomes. Our aim was to examine different treatment methods and outcomes in a cohort of women with secondary infertility. Study design This study involved a retrospective case series for patients ( n = 26) diagnosed with and treated for a CSDi between 2008 and 2019 at a tertiary care centre in British Columbia, Canada, by one of three gynecologists with expertise in CSDi repair. Surgical repair was performed via laparoscopy for residual myometrial thickness (RMT) < 3.0 mm, and via hysteroscopy otherwise. Postoperative pregnancy rates and reproductive outcomes are reported. This study also included a search of the literature to gain an overview of the indications, outcomes, advantages, disadvantages, and risks associated with four surgical approaches (hysteroscopic, laparoscopic, vaginal, abdominal) used in the management of CSDi. A Medline and manual searches of referenced articles were conducted for this purpose. Results Twenty-six patients with CSDi were diagnosed with secondary infertility (mean age = 36.4 years) during the study period. Twenty of these patients underwent surgical management, with 12 receiving hysteroscopic resection or ablation, and 8 receiving laparoscopic repair. Six patients had no treatment or are still awaiting management at this time. Postoperatively, 11/20 patients (55%) were able to successfully conceive at least once. 8/11 patients were from the hysteroscopy group (66% pregnancy rate) and 10/11 pregnancies resulted in live births at term. In the laparoscopy group, there were 3 pregnancies (37.5% pregnancy rate), including 2 term live births, and 1 preterm live birth at 26 weeks. With respect to our review of the literature, a total of 49 articles were included in our final review of surgical techniques used in the management of CSDi. Conclusions This study suggests that surgical repair can improve pregnancy rates in patients with secondary infertility in the context of a confirmed CSDi.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".