Quantitative Ultrasound for Glomerulosclerosis in Ex Vivo Murine Kidneys
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background: Focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS) is a condition that can lead to kidney function loss over time, making early detection and diagnosis essential for effective treatment and management. The glomeruli are the main source of ultrasound scattering in the kidney. This study proposes a novel approach to detecting FSGS using a multi-parametric quantitative ultrasound (QUS) approach in ex-vivo murine kidney models. QUS analyzes the spectral content of radiofrequency data in ultrasound to provide user- and system-independent quantifiable measurements, such as backscatter. We hypothesize that as FSGS progresses, there is a measurable increase in backscatter. Methods: Five mice were recruited to each cohort of a podocalyxin knockout (PKO) model, a puromycin aminonucleoside (PAN) model and healthy controls. QUS was performed using a 128-element linear transducer at 15.625 MHz. From radiofrequency data, we extracted 16 parameters. To avoid overfitting, principal component analysis was used to create a reduced set of three parameters. These were inputs to a support vector machine for multi-class classification using a 5-fold cross validation scheme. Histopathologic analysis, performed by two expert pathologists, was used to determine the burden of FSGS as the ground truth. Results: The average PKO case had 7% global segmental glomerulosclerosis and 19% FSGS, while the average PAN case had 20% global segmental glomerulosclerosis, 17% FSGS, and 7% total inflammation. Across all spatial locations or views, no significant differences in QUS parameters were found within a cohort. The mean classification accuracy was 80% across the three groups, with the mean precision, recall, and F1 scores being 0.86, 0.80, and 0.78, respectively. Misclassification only occurred in three PKO cases that were considered normal by the algorithm. The Nakagami scale parameter showed significant differences between the PAN model and the others, while the shape parameter showed significant differences between the PKO model and the others. Conclusions: This study demonstrates that ultrasound measurements alone can effectively discriminate between healthy and diseased models of FSGS in mice. The results provide a foundation for further research into the quantification of kidney disease burden and its eventual use in humans. Funding: Government Support - Non-U.S.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".