MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4397041199 · doi:10.1681/asn.20233411s11087b

On Growing Home: A Single-Centre Experience with a Dedicated Peritoneal Dialysis Access Clinic

2023· article· en· W4397041199 on OpenAlexaffabout
Shabnam Hamidi, Bourne L. Auguste, Matthew J. Oliver

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the American Society of Nephrology · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicDialysis and Renal Disease Management
Canadian institutionsHealth Sciences CentreUniversity of TorontoSunnybrook Health Science Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPeritoneal dialysisMedicineHome dialysisIntensive care medicineUrologyInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Growing home dialysis programs has been a priority across Canada over the last decade. Initially a rise in home dialysis rates was observed across the country with initiatives targeting predialysis modality education, the use of transitional care units and increased utilization of assisted home dialysis programs. However, this growth has been challenging to sustain with observed attrition during the COVID-19 pandemic. In 2018, our center established a peritoneal dialysis (PD) access clinic as a means to streamline the process of establishing PD access for patients who had chosen PD as their modality of choice. Herein we describe our center's experience with this dedicated access clinic. Methods: We reviewed the charts of 29 prevalent predialysis patients who selected PD as their dialysis modality of choice and had an appointment with our PD Access Clinic (PDAC) between March 2021 and November 2022. We collected baseline data including eGFR (mL/min) and risk of progression to ESKD at 2 years' time (as measured by the Kidney Failure Risk Equation) at the time of their appointment, time to PD catheter access and first dialysis modality. We also collected information on unplanned dialysis starts, defined as hemodialysis access placed during hospital admission. Results: The mean (SD) patient age was 67 (14) years. Patients had an average eGFR of 10 mL/min and KFRE of 64% at the time of their initial PDAC appointment. There were a median of 3 months to PD catheter insertion from their access clinic appointment. Less than half of patients (45%) ended up on PD as their first dialysis modality and 20% of patients had an unplanned dialysis start. 17% remained predialysis at the time of our review. Conclusions: Dedicated PD access clinics do not ensure preferred dialysis modality. Unplanned dialysis starts occur with a high degree of frequency despite predialysis clinics. Earlier referral for PD access at higher eGFR may increase likelihood of peritoneal dialysis as the initial modality and would be a future area of study.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.019

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.314
Teacher spread0.284 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the American Society of Nephrology→Same topicDialysis and Renal Disease Management→French-language works237,207→